Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 March 7

< March 6	March 8 >

March 7[edit]

File:Otagoflag.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:07, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned raster image that was not used to create the corresponding vector image and thus is not needed for attribution purposes, this time nominated at the correct place. House Blaster^talk 03:55, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(from uploader) If it's now redundant to a better image, feel free to delete it. Grutness...wha? 06:21, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bintou01.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

De-PRODded under assumption that screenshots are acceptable for use in Template:Infobox film. However, the template's documentation has not mentioned specifically any screenshots other than "title card". Neither does WP:FILMPOSTER. Furthermore, the screenshot depicts a woman and a boy reading a book together in the film Bintou. However, the frame can be conveyed in text, and/or the frame itself doesn't contextually represent the branding or marketing of the film. Whether it significantly improves contextual understanding of the film isn't the main issue. The issue is whether omitting the screenshot drastically deprives readers from contextually understanding the whole film. Sadly, as I can assume, the text content can already convey what the whole film is about. George Ho (talk) 06:19, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Optillusionsci.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 23:15, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support deletion - orphaned raster image not used to create the corresponding vector image and thus is not needed for attribution purposes. House Blaster^talk 13:54, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete - This image is black and orange, the later image is black and white. The shape is also completely different. Yoshiman6464 ^♫🥚 18:11, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Radin Mass Community Centre Mural4.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No indication whether there is freedom of panorama for 2D graphics works where this picture was taken. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:35, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:28, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Breidablik helmet v1 1.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 23:35, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Breidablik helmet v1 1.jpg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 23:19, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, questionable licensing and no obvious reason why the file is useful if converted to non-free. Salavat (talk) 00:29, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Xylitol to xylitol pentaacetate reaction.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 23:37, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The product structure is factually incorrect: it has the carboxyl groups backwards (these are methyl esters of longer carbon chains, not acetate esters of the original alcohols). It's also a typographic problem (subscripting) and should be uploaded to commons once corrected. DMacks (talk) 23:21, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Yes, there are problems with this chemical diagram. Both chemical structures are missing the relevant stereochemical information. The product of the reaction is drawn incorrectly. The reagent is acetic anhydride, not acetic acid. The inconsistent highlighting of some atom labels with red color is just confusing. I have created File:Xylitol to xylitol pentaacetate reaction.svg as a replacement. Innerstream (talk) 00:47, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the replacements! DMacks (talk) 06:27, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.