Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 March 6

< March 5	March 7 >

March 6[edit]

File:Luciano Castillo Headshot.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:09, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a picture of the uploader. No evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 09:20, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Simala Church in Cebu M. Verch.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:09, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr-sourced image by a Flickr photographer who is already black-listed at Commons. He is notorious for freely licensing his images but later making his images as traps for reusers who might be forced to pay some royalties to the said photographer. See also: c:Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Images by Marco Verch, c:Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with marco verch, and c:Commons:Deletion requests/undefinedMarco Verch. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:07, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The consensus on Commons as per Pitke's verdict on COM:Del_req/Files found with marco verch: "Community consensus has previously been established that this author's photos cause more trouble than they are worth due to their spotty record with authorship status of their uploads, history of aggressively demanding fees from reusers of his media who fail to follow the license precisely, and being apparently an indefinitely banned user here on Commons." JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:16, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Stirling's Approximation.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support deletion - orphaned raster image not used to create the corresponding vector image and thus is not needed for attribution purposes. House Blaster^talk 19:37, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to SVG file. Salavat (talk) 03:11, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wirecoil2.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious claim of own work due to small size and lack of metadata. Appears to be out of scope anyway. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:59, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 03:13, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.