Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spoo (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No prejudice against redirection as a viable search term, but the fictional food currently isn't mentioned in the Babylon 5 potential target article. czar 18:27, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spoo[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

None-notable food from a TV show. Article should be redirected to the main Babylon 5 article. Jtrainor (talk) 18:22, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:32, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:32, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:32, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:32, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not convinced from the previous discussions that this article is notable. It may have been fulfilling notability criteria back when it was first created, but not in the modern day. "Keep" arguments that it was mentioned in several books but said books appear to be WP:PRIMARY sources rather than secondary ones. A clear example of something that belongs on Wikia rather than Wikipedia._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 04:53, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Redirect to Babylon 5 or one of the other articles relating to the television program. I can find no secondary sources so this fails WP:GNG. The article's sources are WP:PRIMARY. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 23:34, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect to Babylon 5 given the above discussion. I do not believe there are enough secondary sources to support this article's notability, though it could still be a viable search term so a redirect may be helpful. Aoba47 (talk) 23:27, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.