Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lyndsey (second nomination)

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splash^talk 22:40, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

Lyndsey

Not only was Dan100's closure of the first nomination grossly improper, he didn't even finish the job. Has been transwikied, like consensus was to do last time. Now we get to stare at this for another week. —Cryptic (talk) 13:44, 15 September 2005 (UTC)

• Well, I'll get the ball rolling then - Delete. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Demogorgon's Soup-taster 14:32, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Whatever this is, it's not an encyclopedia article. Friday (talk) 20:06, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, easily. — Phil Welch 21:57, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect, disambiguate or do anything to retain the name as a link. Lindsay is apparently a disambigaution page, you could redirect it there. (unsigned comment}
  • Lindsay is disambiguated because it is a surname and a location. Lyndsey is neither. We don't disambiguate given names. —Cryptic (talk) 06:23, 17 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.