Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lyndsey

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. Dan100 (Talk) 11:57, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Lyndsey[edit]

Dictionary definition? Name derivations are not encyclopedic. Does wiktionary take these? Zoe 23:22, September 8, 2005 (UTC)

Yes, it does. See wikt:Appendix:Names. Transwiki and delete. —Cryptic (talk) 23:36, 8 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Transwiki and delete: dicdef. - mholland 23:40, 8 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Just move to dictionaryKiwidude 23:48, September 8, 2005 (UTC)
- Why do we want to keep this? Zoe 05:06, September 9, 2005 (UTC)
Transwiki if we must, and delete. WP:ISNOT a genealogy. -Splash 00:34, 9 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. – AxSkov (☏) 10:29, 9 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Splash is right. WP:ISNOT a genealogy. Dottore So 23:45, 9 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: This article is not a genealogy either. It's an etymology and a definition. We send those to Wiktionary, we don't just delete them. —Cryptic (talk) 01:15, 10 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  - Uh, I suggested originally that it might go to Wiktionary, and most of the votes are to do that. Am I confused? Zoe 20:02, September 10, 2005 (UTC)
    - If you need to ask whether or not you're confused, you probably are! CLW 20:52, 10 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    - Sorry, I should have indented more. —Cryptic (talk) 00:10, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.