Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fleet Buzz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Stagecoach South. Daniel (talk) 07:52, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fleet Buzz[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough significant coverage, fails WP:GNG. SK2242 (talk) 06:42, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. SK2242 (talk) 06:42, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. SK2242 (talk) 06:42, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. SK2242 (talk) 06:42, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, it should not be deleted. A part of the Stagecoach in Hants & Surrey network has been shaped thanks to Fleet Buzz. It has been significantly documented over its 20 year existence. Grandtubetrains (talk) 08:33, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Grandtubetrains: Please cite at least 3 pieces of significant coverage from independent reliable sources. SK2242 (talk) 09:43, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@SK2242: There are several sources that stated Fleet Buzz in their declining times. One such is Coach & Bus Week.^[1] Another is the WLTM Transport Blog.^[2] The final source is the GOV UK's Companies House website.^[3] Grandtubetrains (talk) 12:07, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blogs are not reliable and government listings do not show notability. So that’s only 1 source. SK2242 (talk) 15:56, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Stagecoach South. Nightfury 08:36, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Found another source.^[4] Grandtubetrains (talk) 18:05, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Enthusiast websites aren’t reliable and so cannot be used for establishing notability. SK2242 (talk) 19:34, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 00:41, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect as an alternative to deletion to Stagecoach South. Topic fails NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 11:50, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[1] ttps://cbwmagazine.com/demise-of-fleet-buzz-criticised/page/734/

[2] ttps://wltmauc.blogspot.com/2014/12/hants-cuts-fleet-buzz-30-77.html

[3] ttps://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/04974459

[4] ttp://buszone.co.uk/CWT.html

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]