Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bipartisan Cafe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. ✗plicit 13:44, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bipartisan Cafe[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTTRAVELGUIDE, just a few local WP:RESTAURANTREVIEWS is not enough to establish notability. --wooden superman 12:50, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. --wooden superman 12:50, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and Oregon. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:03, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per GNG (disclaimer: article creator). This is a continuation of Portland restaurant entries mass-nominated for deletion unnecessarily. Like prior attempts to gut coverage of the city's restaurant industry, I have no choice but to assume nominator did not complete a thorough source assessment before jumping to AfD because I very easily found many reliable local and regional publications and other industry outlets providing in-depth coverage of the business. I've asked the nominator to please post concerns on talk pages before mass-nominating and jumping to AfD. Based on sufficient coverage, this entry should be kept and expanded, not deleted. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 21:41, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, has 50 seemingly reputable sources, and the text points out it's a major city location for political meetings, other group events, and historical context. Randy Kryn (talk) 15:31, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - has enough RS to suggest notability. If the article is lacking, improvement is a better alternative to deletion. ButlerBlog (talk) 19:35, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep meets WP:GNG. The person who loves reading (talk) 17:07, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.