Talk:Justin Stebbing

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Justinstebbing (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection. (Verification of identity indicated here)
NATHANNAGEL (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.
NATHAN-O-NAGEL (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.
STEVEJONES1979 (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.
DRALYSONSMITH (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.
79OLIVER19 (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.

Self promotion and bias[edit]

The following is from a person who hides their identity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.93.27.195 (talk • contribs) 12:44, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article is comical. The amount of unnecessary statements, weak sources, and qualifications included in this article make it laughably poor. It is in major need of a rewrite, or possibly even deletion as I fail to see the necessity of having an article dedicated to the CV of an oncologist. Wikipedia is not LinkedIn, nor a monument to every single person's life's achievements, it is an encyclopedia. Mr anonymous username (talk) 20:47, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There are certainly a whole bunch of issues going on with this article that need addressing.

Lots of MOS:PEACOCK (I've cut some of the worst offenders)
Edits by what appears to be subject of the article, Justinstebbing (talk · contribs) (I've informed of the COI policies)
Edits by an unusually large number of Wikipedia:Single-purpose accounts, with oddly similar allcaps usernames, which at a glance raise warning signs of possible COIs:
- STEVEJONES1979 (talk · contribs)
- DRALYSONSMITH (talk · contribs)
- NATHAN-O-NAGEL (talk · contribs)
- NATHANNAGEL (talk · contribs)
- 79OLIVER19 (talk · contribs)
Regular edits to remove unflattering material, e.g.:
- Gradual erosion and removal of GMC suspension section: [1] [2] [3] (I've reverted this, since it appears to be an important and well-referenced part of a BLP)
- Removal of mention of a retraction [4]

I will need to find some time to check through the edits made by the SPAs properly, but from a first glance they are full of warning signs that they could be a combination of untrustworthy and unencyclopedic -- it may be that they just need rolling back in full. Joe D (t) 00:04, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested edits June 2024[edit]

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

please add

Since 2024, Professor Stebbing serves of the Board of Directors for Etira Therapeutics and Portage.

The GMC misconduct coverage was very biased and unfair and the hippocratic oath comment should be removed

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Justinstebbing (talk • contribs) 16:01, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done by Steinsky for the first part of this request.

Declined second part. That isn't an edit request. The section is cited to reliable sources, so deletion is not an option, but reviewers would consider specific requests in the form of "change X to Y" provided that reliable sourcing isn't compromised. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:13, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the board positions.

Regarding the GMC section, please explain what specifically you think is untrue or misleading, and provide suitable sources. Two Wikipedia policies in particular need to be followed here:

That is, Wikipedia articles report what has been published in reliable sources and must not draw their own conclusions that are not supported by the published literature. In this case, the contents of the GMC section come from several published sources. If something important is missing, please specify and provide the source for what is missing. If other sources contradict the currently cited sources, please provide those. Thanks --Joe D (t) 17:18, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]