Wikipedia talk:Vagueness
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Vagueness page. |
|
Essays High‑impact | ||||||||||
|
Regulation Change[edit]
The regulations have changed and the content of the page is invalid. EME requirements has changed. RS — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.87.180.236 (talk) 05:27, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- Please tell us your conserns
- — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:640:8303:af20:1c1c:8d71:609b:e5f6 (talk) 03:37, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
Merge?[edit]
It appears that this essay covers the same scope as MOS:WTW, to which this page should probably be merged with. 2600:1700:A2A0:FB50:951E:9D9A:F168:AF9F (talk) 03:58, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
- Support; merge into #Expressions that lack precision in the corresponding article --Firestar464 (talk) 03:15, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Confusing unclear[edit]
These are subjective qualifications. So be more clear as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Koitus~nlwiki (talk • contribs) 23:57, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Vague and WP:Vague now redirect here (to WP:Vagueness). I submitted it on Wikipedia:How to make a redirect ✔
— Massmediazealot (talk) 08:55, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Merge with Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch ?[edit]
I agree with @2600:1700:A2A0:FB50:951E:9D9A:F168:AF9F and @Firestar464 above that these articles overlap and should be merged.
I will add "See also: Wikipedia:Please clarify and Wikipedia:Vagueness" to:
- Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch#Expressions that lack precision
- Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Vocabulary#Subset terms
—Massmediazealot (talk) 09:23, 4 February 2023 (UTC)