Wikipedia:Suspected copyright violations/2012-05-01

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2012-05-01 (Suspected copyright violations)[edit]
  • There is a disagreement about whether they should be merged back together, I have added appropriate attribution in the mean time, so as far as copyvio it should be resolved. Monty845 20:42, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • There is a disagreement about whether they should be merged back together, I have added appropriate attribution in the mean time, so as far as copyvio it should be resolved. Monty845 20:47, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Original article deleted G12. Monty845 20:59, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article blanked for evaluation and closure through WP:CP. Monty845 20:59, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:21, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Cleaned by User: DGG. Monty845 21:10, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rephrased to avoid close paraphrasing. Monty845 21:18, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Current version does not appear to be a copyvio, copyvio was in original revision, so no way to clean history without destroying attribution. Monty845 21:25, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Most of the article text is the poem itself, which is obviously PD, there was one copied sentence that would not be PD, and it has been rephrased. Monty845 21:34, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Copied as a template for new article, attribution corrected. Monty845 21:39, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Same author, new topic, no need for attribution based on the report, there may be a page somewhere to which the formatting should be attributed, but no evidence here of it. Monty845 21:43, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Need an admin to check the source article that was deleted G7 to see if hist merge is needed Monty845 21:04, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]