Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 24[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 24, 2024.

Sucking peepee[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 6#Sucking peepee

Helicopter dick[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete * Pppery * it has begun... 18:20, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure this is a plausible typo (or what people would expect when searching this term, so it's worse than having nothing). Previously was discussed (and deleted) at RfD and no one suggested this target. Elli (talk | contribs) 23:39, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - Clearly violates WP:LEAST... this is very much and obviously not what someone would be looking for when searching for this term, and I don't think we have the actual information that this term refers to, so... since we don't have it, delete it. (if someone finds the actual information on wikipedia or wiktionary, please change my !vote to redirect there instead, but I'm at work so I can't search this right now) Fieari (talk) 23:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Implausible typo and is not what I'd expect if I were to, for whatever silly reason, search this term. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:01, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
WP:DAFTify per nom Okmrman (talk) 19:21, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

List of lists[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Keep * Pppery * it has begun... 18:20, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

From previous discussions (in 2013 and 2016), three pages have come up as potential valid redirect targets for this page, List of lists of lists, Wikipedia:Contents/Lists, and Category:Lists.

The current target, List of lists of lists, is in the same namespace, but it's not a complete "list of lists" as not all lists on Wikipedia are listed in "Lists of X" articles, and it's a "list of lists of lists" rather than a direct "list of lists." Next, Wikipedia:Contents/Lists has an approachable format and it's a "list of lists" rather than a "list of lists of lists," but it is also incomplete. And finally, Category:Lists is a complete "list of lists," but it's a category.

I propose that a disambiguation page be created containing these three pages as they all have their pros and cons, making none of them suitable as the sole redirect target. – BrandonXLF (talk) 09:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep and hatnote the other two. Jay 💬 11:59, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 22:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep, local targets are preferred when feasible. I don't see the issue with the current target; it need not be complete. I don't think someone searching this is going to be misled or confused by where they end up. -- Tavix (talk) 01:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Daniel Striped Tiger (band)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 18:14, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Target was redirected to a different subject per an AfD so is no longer about a band. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete but we could mention it at the target in which can I would favour keeping. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:19, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Netflix films no longer mentioned[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 18:13, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The titles of these Netflix original films are no longer mentioned in their target. 2607:FEA8:761F:4600:301D:BAB0:803F:CEE (talk) 21:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Star Wars™[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 10:30, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

with the deletion of Peppa Pig TM, this probably also deserves a discussion in the same vain. Okmrman (talk) 19:24, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no one is going to go out of their way to try and get the special characters for TM to search for that when Star Wars would have come up by then anyway. Canterbury Tail talk 19:32, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete™ per Canterbury Tail, implausible search term. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 23:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete™ per this being Totally Bogus Dude™
also did you mean "vein" cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:01, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete™. Useless. Cleo Cooper (talk) 03:42, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete™: Unless someone adds the TM character to keyboards any time soon. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 18:11, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: impossible to write without knowledge of special characters, and also WP:SNOW by this point. Cambalachero (talk) 18:24, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • .Mon rep mteteled Steel1943 (talk) 23:13, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Eh…it looks fairly clear what the result is probably going to be at this point, but I’m not convinced that this redirect is problematic enough to warrant deletion. All the best, ‍—‍a smart kitten[meow] 10:53, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete™: Someone would need to copy-paste the trademark character from a Unicode website, which would be time-consuming. Oh, wait- TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 08:36, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Larissa Hodge[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 6#Larissa Hodge

Ductal[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 18:13, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ductal is a product of Lafarge but isn't mentioned on the article at all. The redirect exists due to a 2015 deletion discussion of the article [1], I believe a redirect to duct would be better given ductal is the adjectivial form of duct. Traumnovelle (talk) 07:27, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 17:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Redirected via an AFD, no longer mentioned in the article ... it's time. Steel1943 (talk) 18:52, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Comedy Shorts Gamer (entertainer)[edit]

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:44, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page history?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:49, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • I just added mention. Brother of the subject - refine to the #Early life section. If kept, Comedy Shorts Gamer which is protected, may also be recreated as a redirect. Jay 💬 12:19, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 17:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: The "added mention" Jay is referring to spells the subject as "ComedyShortsGamer" (no spaces). Stating this for editors to be able to find the mention, otherwise I have no opinion. Steel1943 (talk) 18:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep - ComedyShortsGamer is now mentioned at the target, albeit briefly. Refine target to #ComedyShortsGamer, where I’ve added an anchor. I agree with Jay that the protected title Comedy Shorts Gamer can be recreated as a redirect if this is kept, as can ComedyShortsGamer & Comedyshortsgamer. All the best, ‍—‍a smart kitten[meow] 11:50, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

National culture[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:28, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"National culture" is mentioned on the target page, but it isn't a subhead, and this seems to me to be a strange article to redirect this to. I'm not sure someone who searches for "national culture" will understand why they're on this page. I'm not excited about any of the alternatives I considered (Nationalism?), maybe someone here has a better idea? asilvering (talk) 03:54, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe Cultural nationalism? Traumnovelle (talk) 07:30, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. I recommend searching the nation state page for the exact query "cultur". Try to read the portions where those terms appear. The relevant information is in there, but it's not collected as one topic. I would like to see this info collected somewhere on wikipedia. But for now, the best way/ best place on wikip to understand this broad topic is to understand modern nation-state nationalism broadly, which is also not a casual task. Ethnicity/ race, language, and religion (whether monistic or varied within the state), are main themes you'll encounter. Then you'll see what a national culture is in a given nation state. Education is also part of projects of national culture. skakEL 21:14, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 17:54, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete and defer to search results. We have multiple articles that would fit as targets for this as a keyword search, and that's what we have a search engine for. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:04, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Ivanvector. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:20, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Technofascism and Techno-fascism[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 11#Technofascism and Techno-fascism

F-Bomb (film)[edit]

Per WP:RDEL #8 BilledMammal (talk) 03:14, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 17:34, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 17:45, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. No title matches exist. Steel1943 (talk) 18:57, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Fuck (2005 film) per footnote [b]: ...alternatively referred to as Fuck: A Documentary and The F-Bomb: A Documentary. -- Tavix (talk) 17:02, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per Tavix. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:05, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per Tavix. An {{R from short title}} of an alternative name specified in the article, with a valid parenthetical disambiguator (per Jay's comment under #The F-Bomb (film) - the lead introduces the subject as a documentary film). All the best, ‍—‍a smart kitten[meow] 12:50, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The F-Bomb (film)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Fuck (2005 film). ✗plicit 01:00, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:RDEL #8 BilledMammal (talk) 03:13, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 17:34, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"The F-Bomb (documentary)" redirect was deleted today, but I don't know why. I didn't know it was listed at RfD. When I had made the above comment, it was not. Jay 💬 17:42, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 17:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

F-Bomb (movie)[edit]

Per WP:RDEL #8 BilledMammal (talk) 03:07, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 17:34, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: 2x (edit conflict)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 17:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. No title matches exist. Steel1943 (talk) 18:58, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Fuck (2005 film), a movie titled (at least in part) "F-Bomb", per Tavix' arguments in the related discussions above. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:07, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Fuck (2005 film) per Tavix's comments in other threads regarding the footnote at that article. An {{R from short title}} of an alternative name specified in the article, with a valid parenthetical disambiguator (the article introduces the subject as a documentary film, and - as evidenced by our article - movie is a synonym for film). All the best, ‍—‍a smart kitten[meow] 12:53, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:FLUFF[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 2#Wikipedia:FLUFF

2022 abortion performed on a 10-year-old in Ohio[edit]

Delete as inaccurate and implausible. The abortion was performed in Indiana, not Ohio. -- Tavix (talk) 18:11, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - Keep per WP:CHEAP. --Jax 0677 (talk) 21:40, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Jax 0677: Why? WP:CHEAP doesn't explain why this redirect should be kept, it explains the general state of redirects. That's why you'll rarely see others cite it at RfD, it doesn't say anything in particular. Instead, it'd be more helpful to explain why you created it and why it may be a useful redirect, despite being inaccurate. -- Tavix (talk) 15:16, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Reply - Some people do not know that the abortion was performed in Indiana. Additionally, the redirect is not blocking any other article from being created. --Jax 0677 (talk) 20:42, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Also see this discussion: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_April_5#10-year-old_Ohio_rape_victim_required_to_cross_state_lines_to_obtain_abortion Okmrman (talk) 21:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Searching this term is entirely plausible, as the title lends itself to potential confusion by mentioning both Ohio and Indiana. TNstingray (talk) 23:08, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. This is fine. Someone searching for this term will find out the facts of the case. BD2412 T 02:59, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, Wikipedia is not a search engine, redirects should not be accommodating inaccurate keywords cobbled together into a never-before-seen title. As the abortion was not performed in Ohio, this cannot be an alternative name for the subject. Typing this into the search bar is far more insightful than maintaining this as a redirect, as readers will see the correct title and realize "Ah, it was the Indiana abortion case; the abortion was not performed in Ohio". This redirect currently causes confusion and presents a faulty equalization that a Ohio-abortion case = Indiana-abortion case, as there's no mention of a "Ohio-abortion misconception" or anything that would imply such a misconception. The redirect in question does not appear written at the target page (as it's untrue), nor does it appear anywhere on Wikipedia (as it's untrue). Utopes (talk / cont) 07:11, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Redirects don't have to be mentioned in the article; there is no requirement for that. WhatamIdoing (talk) 23:39, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I never said that being mentioned is a requirement. Thousands don't, probably. But not being mentioned, heck, not even ever alluded to, absolutely demolishes any of the little motivation for keeping misleading information in the form of a redirect void-of-context. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:35, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as a plausible – though apparently not popular – search term, because not everyone is going to remember where the abortion physically happened. It sounds like the concern is that some editors parse the title as meaning that Ohio was the location of the abortion, rather than the (usual) location of the child – i.e., that "2022 abortion performed on a 10-year-old in Ohio" is equal to "2022 abortion performed in Ohio on a 10-year-old" and is factually inaccurate, but "2022 abortion performed on a 10-year-old from Ohio" would be accurate. I see their point, but I think that asking for grammatical perfection in a redirect is not necessary. The point of a redirect is to get people to the article that contains the accurate facts, and this will achieve that goal. Just as I think the incorrect hyphenation is not a good reason to delete a redirect, I think the suboptimal preposition isn't a good reason to delete it. Also, it looks like an RM during the first weeks of the article's existence introduced the "in Ohio" idea. WhatamIdoing (talk) 00:07, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    "Plausible, but not very popular" is a wild misrepresentation of the fundamental facts. This makes the assumption that A: writing a backwards, incorrect, non-existent / Google search prompt is "plausible", and B: a grand total of zero views with the last 12 months is "apparently not popular"... "Apparently"?? Even with the clunky overly-specific and still somehow incorrect title out of the way, was there a world that this title was even going to get a view? No, it's completely unnatural and would be expected to exist by zero people on Wikipedia. If you ask 100 people to describe the case in 30 different ways, I'm nearly positive that this title wouldn't appear ever, much less make the shortlist for likely and useful redirects. This is a search term, not worthy of a redirect. Search terms as redirects are a horrible precedent as is, as there's literally infinite search terms in existence and not worthwhile to entertain as long as Wikipedia has a build-in search box that captures every single variety, and everything I've tried has led to 100% accurate results as long as the text exists.
    And yet, with all of those tests, there are thousands of theoretical implausible search-term-redirects that could (and don't) exist. And all of the thousands would be far better options that 2022 abortion performed on a 10-year-old in Ohio in its current state, as it's literally a lie. On the chance that this is naturally typed into Wikipedia, with someone asking themselves "was this abortion in Indiana or Ohio?", they get a wrong answer. Why click further? The title implies the events already, and the implication is simply untrue. There's like 30+ other redirects currently here that capture every reasonable (and unreasonable) outcome, this untruth variant is simply not necessary. It's harmful and confusing and deletable per WP:RDEL #2. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:15, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 01:22, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: Wikipedia is not Google, and even if it was, the redirect is still inaccurate. DrowssapSMM 13:58, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete inaccurate and implausible search term. TarnishedPathtalk 09:56, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Wikipedia is not a search engine StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 15:20, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - search term with enough relevant facts to identify the target, and catches searches where the reader doesn't know (or care) which particular state the specific events occurred in. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:57, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    So does this mean that as long as a redirect is 80% correct, it doesn't matter if the remaining 20% is wrong/misleading because 80 is still a passing grade? There's an infinite number of 100% correct titles out there, I feel we should be focusing on redirecting those rather than phrases that are 90% or 80% or 70% correct; "close enough" isn't enough to redirect (the search bar solves all of those problems). Utopes (talk / cont) 17:20, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, that's exactly what it means. A redirect is meant to get readers to the information they're looking for, not penalize them for not already knowing certain specific (and to non-Americans, largely irrelevant) details of an event. Unless we have many articles on American children being sexually assaulted and then forced to travel to a different state for critical medical care that's denied to them in their home states for stupid religious reasons, "close enough" is just that: close enough. Taking them to the information they're obviously looking for is clearly better than taking them to an error message. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 01:04, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Okay... so throwing a hodgepodge of accurate enough words in a title gives one freedom to fill the remaining 20% with lies, I guess? Maybe nobody outside of America cares about the details and whether the abortion was in Indiana or Tennessee or Alaska or on the moon. Having unexplained lies in a title is inherently confusing, given that the 30 other ~implausible redirects that were created to this article are going to autofill here first. "Details being irrelevant" and "true accuracy doesn't matter" isn't just a pandora's box, it's a crushing typhoon of redirection malpractice. What error message would people see? The search results?? That's where readers go for 99.9% of the infinite search terms out there anyway. Utopes (talk / cont) 02:37, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as a plausible search term. Frank Anchor 20:21, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete because often times you don't see the redirection header when viewing the article; hence, such incorrect redirects may cause confusion. Bwrs (talk) 05:20, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 17:40, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

F-Bomb (documentary)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 01:02, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:RDEL #8 BilledMammal (talk) 03:14, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 17:34, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"The F-Bomb (documentary)" redirect was deleted today, but I don't know why. I didn't know it was listed at RfD. When I had made the above comment, it was not. Jay 💬 07:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 17:39, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. No title matches exist. Steel1943 (talk) 02:58, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:09, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Tavix's comments in other threads regarding the footnote at that article. An {{R from short title}} of an alternative name specified in the article, with a valid parenthetical disambiguator (the target article introduces the subject as a documentary film). All the best, ‍—‍a smart kitten[meow] 12:56, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The F-Bomb (movie)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Fuck (2005 film). ✗plicit 01:01, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:RDEL #8 BilledMammal (talk) 03:14, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 17:34, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 17:38, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Dulah, California[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 11#Dulah, California

Colonia Ulpia Traiana[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 11#Colonia Ulpia Traiana

Draft:2021 Wikimedia Foundation's actions in Chinese Wikipedia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) ToadetteEdit! 17:20, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article is already live. No need for a draft title. Ahri.boy (talk) 17:02, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Culture Jam (mixtape)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 1#Culture Jam (mixtape)

Kawaii Leonard[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 1#Kawaii Leonard

LeBron Jim[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 16:08, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as redirect creator (though I oppose a G7 speedy). While "Jim" is a common abbreviation for the given name "James", it does not appear to translate the same way for the surname, thus making the redirect more unnecessary than I thought when creating it in 2009. Frank Anchor 14:03, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Crowsus (talk) 14:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Jim. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:26, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Implausible to a point where it could plausibly refer to someone else. Steel1943 (talk) 03:01, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

LeOld LeBald Le4and6[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 16:08, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Crowsus (talk) 14:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Frank Anchor 15:05, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep A variety of Le____ have been used to refer to LeBron James and nominator hasn't demonstrating any harm in this redirect existing. There are reasons other than typos for redirects existing and therefore nomination hasn't met deletion criteria. pbp 15:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Who is going to search "LeOld LeBald Le4and6" to find LeBron James? Someone just put together three random nicknames that are used to mock him, what is the point of having this? Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 20:37, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Mazewaxie: That "someone" is actually the editor who you're replying to, since they're the ones who created the redirect. CycloneYoris talk! 22:44, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom + disparaging nickname. Not every string of three vaguely plausible nicknames deserve a redirect, and there isn't evidence for these three specifically being found together as a nickname. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 23:46, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom, absolutely useless and beyond unlikely to use this title to reach one of the most recognized athletes of all time. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:27, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom et al. Useless nonsense. CycloneYoris talk! 22:45, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Implausible WP:NEO-ish redirect. Steel1943 (talk) 22:53, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Nba allstar 2007 mvp[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 1#Nba allstar 2007 mvp

The ceiling is the roof[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 16:08, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:53, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete This is a quote from Jordan [2], but it is not mentioned so the redirect is unhelpful. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 15:37, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep As noted above, was a quote from Jordan. Nominator seems to have nominated NBA-related redirects en masse and doesn't seem to understand redirect rules. pbp 15:50, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The quote is from Jordan, but is it particularly relevant to have a redirect? Also it's never mentioned in Jordan's article. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 20:38, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    From what I've seen so far, the nominator understands the rules perfectly well. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:30, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as an unmentioned quote. Nothing about "ceilings" nor "roofs" ever is discussed at the target page. There is no context as to what this quote is, who said it, or why it's a redirect there (or what part of the page it is pertinent to). Michael Jordan is one of the greatest athletes of all time, so anyone that wants to reach his page can easily do so through his name or the 20 other redirects that point here. Making a conscious decision to type in "the ceiling is a roof" implies that searchers are looking for a specific topic, and such a topic is not covered at the target article or anywhere on Wikipedia. Its existence misleads readers into a wild goose chase to find non-existent material. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No mention on the page, no demonstrated relevance, not Wikiquote.—Bagumba (talk) 10:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

God's team[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 16:07, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:51, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Crowsus (talk) 14:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete This phrase appears to come from a quote by Sergio Ramos which is mentioned in the article. I don't think that's enough to warrant a redirect, but I could be convinced otherwise if there is evidence that this is a more common nickname. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 15:52, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and definitely don't keep, as a vague and unhelpful term that would be more suitable for any other topic related to god and a team from a religious sense. Utopes (talk / cont) 08:04, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: whilst they have been referred to as this at least once, I imagine a bunch of other sports teams will also have been referred to as this, as the term is vague. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:19, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Draft:Taylor Swift[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 1#Draft:Taylor Swift

King Kev[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 16:07, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:30, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. It is the most common nickname for him, but dates back to the 1970s. Anyone looking for him would surely be aware of his name and just type that. Crowsus (talk) 14:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep If It is the most common nickname for him as Crowsus asserts, then it should be added to the article. I don't see how this would be an implausible search term in that case. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 15:38, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I have added a mention. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 16:12, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Presidentman, navigationally useful. Nickname should be sourced and added to article. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:5450:3A3:46CC:17EC (talk) 17:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: It's a valid nickname for him. "It's from the 1970s" doesn't make it less valid as a search term. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:20, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Eleven of Hearts[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 16:07, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:24, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Crowsus (talk) 14:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - not included in this article and the section name after the # does not even exist any more. However, there are external links which has that but since Eleven of Hearts is more than one entity [3], it is best served as it's own article, subject to notability, excluding the Gareth Bale trademark celebration. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 16:27, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Leo Di[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 16:07, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:22, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Crowsus (talk) 14:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, unnatural and unexpected chopping of first and last name, would not be searched and would not discourage readers from finding the main page. Utopes (talk / cont) 08:03, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom --Lenticel (talk) 00:19, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Regordinho[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 16:06, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:19, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Also a possibly insulting redirect: "regordinho" is Portuñol for "very fat" (literally), which is a play on Ronaldinho (similarly pronounced). Bedivere (talk) 00:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Bedivere. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:59, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: not used in media, and seems to be being used as an insult. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:43, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Originaldo[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 1#Originaldo

Diego Marradonna[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 1#Diego Marradonna

The King of Football[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 1#The King of Football

You cant see me move[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 16:06, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:15, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Crowsus (talk) 14:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, "you can't see me move" is not a phrase mentioned at the target. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

John Seena[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 1#John Seena

Scorsesi[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 1#Scorsesi

Scorsezi[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 1#Scorsezi

Cris Ron[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 16:05, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:13, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Chris Ronaldo[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 16:05, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Crowsus (talk) 14:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as the subject is not called Chris, and there is no mention of "Chris " in the target article's prose. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:51, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Rehan ronaldo[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 16:05, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The World's Top Goal Scorer 2011[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 16:05, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No mainspace page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Crowsus (talk) 14:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Corey Perry. Delete, there are other sports that also have top goal scorers. -- Tavix (talk) 19:07, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, Wikipedia is not Google, this is not how we do redirects. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:52, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: as ambiguous, since many sports exists and have goal scorers. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:46, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Messidona[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 16:05, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Crowsus (talk) 14:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per WP:CHEAP. If found via Internet search, clarifies that it refers to Messi (and not Maradona). Homei (talk) 20:24, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, was going to delete based on being an implausible and unmentioned nickname, but after Homei's explanation my deletion is stronger, as this is now also an WP:XY situation with Maradona, and can understandably apply to either target due to incorporating both players' names equally. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:46, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Messimagician[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 16:04, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:09, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Crowsus (talk) 14:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as Messimagician isn't mentioned at the target. Nobody would type this in after having already typed out "Messi", which redirects to Lionel already. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:57, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

LM19[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 16:04, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:09, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Crowsus (talk) 14:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per WP:CHEAP. Homei (talk) 20:30, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, no mention and no indication that this is a plausible alternative nickname of the subject, based on the content of the article. Anything can be an abbreviation, but in this format it seems unlikely. Messi is one of the most well known athletes of all time, and can be found easily. This redirect is not supported by content, as we have nothing to say about "LM19". Utopes (talk / cont) 07:49, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Joever[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 16:04, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:SSRT. Do we really need to include such 4-chan internet slang with no encyclopedic value, a "word" not used in any articles? Fram (talk) 08:50, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep as creator per WP:CHEAP. Duckmather (talk) 01:33, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:42, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

it's not joever til it's joever, and that entry is goated with the sauce
...apologies for whatever that was, and for the somewhat hidden pun. keep as there are sources cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 11:12, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 11:54, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Clearly pretty cheap and redirects are allowed to be "unencyclopedic". Okmrman (talk) 04:47, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Dr. Seuss Enterprises[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 16:04, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Company not mentioned at target. Should be tagged as {{R without mention}} if kept. CycloneYoris talk! 10:07, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep It's mentioned in these articles. Nightscream (talk) 16:46, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, not because of incoming links (as those don't matter if there's nothing to show for it at the target), but keep because "Enterprises" is mentioned at the article, at least in March '24. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:55, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Kannagi (upcoming film)[edit]

This film released just about 4 months ago and is no longer upcoming. Plenty of time has past to the point that there is no more confusion for a 2023 movie, as it's well into 2024 now. Nobody ending up here who sees "upcoming film" in the title would be surprised by it's removal for a movie releasing last year. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:47, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 18:55, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:02, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 06:50, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:UFILM, the film was released more than 30 days ago. -- Tavix (talk) 18:07, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: still in use, and not ambiguous with another future film that I'm aware of. WP:UFILM states that 'upcoming film' redirects should be nominated for deletion...at least 30 days after the film receives a title or wide release, in order to allow pageviews to taper off (my emphasis) -- 30 days is a minimum, not a requirement to delete after; and the current pageviews indicate that retaining this redirect would be helpful. All the best, ‍—‍a smart kitten[meow] 16:47, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Phone computer[edit]

This seems overly technical. Nobody would really refer to smartphones as a phone computer outside of drawing some comparisons between smartphones and computers. Okmrman (talk) 04:04, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. This is what a smartphone is, and I wouldn't be surprised if the terms were used before "smartphone" became the established term (I can't check as Google is refusing to show me results that are both verbatim and before a given time, and either one alone is overwhelmed by irrelevant results where the two words happen to be adjacent, especially in lists in adverts). Thryduulf (talk) 18:43, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment shouldn't this actually link to telco equipment? Such as a PBX or other phone computers -- 65.92.247.66 (talk) 07:20, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The phrasing of these redirects makes me believe they could also refer to Modem, thus making these redirects ambiguous. Steel1943 (talk) 04:59, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I reaffirm my "delete" per Ivanvector's comment: A disambiguation page would not be the solution since none of the subjects mentioned so far are title matches. Let Wikipedia search do its job instead. Steel1943 (talk) 16:51, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 15:04, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 11:07, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. I think it is easy for English first speakers (or young people) to say they aren't needed, but they probably serve some utility and they perfectly describe what they are. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 11:31, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dabify. As Steel mentioned, a viable interpretation of this would be Modem, being "a phone used by a computer". However, I'd also think that VoIP phone-- a phone that uses the Internet instead of normal phone lines-- or softphone-- a software program that could call other people, which could be downloaded and installed on a PC-- would be valid interpretations of "Phone computer" or "Computer phone". Given I'm sure none of the above- including Smartphone (a phone which is a computer)-- would be a primary target, dabification is warranted. edited at 14:52, 16 April 2024 (UTC) 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 12:03, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - disambiguation pages are for topics that have the same title, not for manually compiled search indexes of possibly related keywords. We have a search engine for that, let it do its job. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:08, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more go…
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 09:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Colonial haiti[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Nominator withdraws. (non-admin closure) Utopes (talk / cont) 00:08, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Grammatical errors. (Haiti warrants capitalization and there is currently no redirect for “Colonial Haiti”). Orphan. Serves no useful purpose. Obvious technical error in its creation. Creator is currently serving an indefinite ban. Savvyjack23 (talk) 02:35, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not useful, only has 255 pageviews per WMFcloud since it starting counting views back in 2015. CitationsFreak (talk) 02:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Side-dump condola[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 16:02, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not a likely typo (the correctly spelled phrase is side dump gondola which has existed as a redirect for a decade). Trainsandotherthings (talk) 02:28, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_April_24&oldid=1223309503"