Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2014 August 15

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 15[edit]

File:Califia2.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:01, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Califia2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jennifer's Book.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:01, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jennifer's Book.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • I seriously doubt that this is in public domain as claimed. Even if Jennifer Carroll released it, that doesn't mean that her publisher agrees. There are several other similar images that I will list below. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:12, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also: File:WHEN YOU GET THERE.jpg File:Care about veterans.jpg File:Space contribution.jpg File:Politics of JC.jpg File:Military defense.jpg File:Family mother of JC.jpg File:ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT.jpg File:Community Service of JC.jpg File:AwardsAwardsAwardsAwardsAwardsAwards.jpg Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:15, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. On the description pages, the uploader wrote "Evidence: The license statement can be found online at: http://jennifercarroll.com". The statement on that website reads "Copyright © 2013-2014 Jennifer S.Carroll. All rights reserved." It's hard to see how that's supposed to be read as evidence of a public domain release. -- Asclepias (talk) 15:49, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:1994 Modem.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G4 by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 21:12, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:1994 Modem.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • This is a photo of artwork ( which needs a seperate permission). Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:43, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Yashu Dhimaan.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:01, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yashu Dhimaan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
Actress about who an article exists. As such, not really "unused personal". -- Asclepias (talk) 15:35, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rishi Samadhiya.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:01, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rishi Samadhiya.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • This looks like a studio posed promotional photo. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:50, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Shaheed Abdul Malek.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:01, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shaheed Abdul Malek.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • This is a scan from a newspaper photo as the half toning is obvious. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:10, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mural-fuller-mill-leeds-alabama.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:01, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mural-fuller-mill-leeds-alabama.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Mural is 2D art, but no further detials of artist/dates given. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:11, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:George Eastman Statue George Eastman Quadrangle River Campus Rochester University Rochester NY.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:01, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:George Eastman Statue George Eastman Quadrangle River Campus Rochester University Rochester NY.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • This a work of 3D art unveiled in the last 10 years, Thusly it might be non-free. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:51, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Economy, Issue 10.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:01, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Economy, Issue 10.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Solution9 Console Window.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:01, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Solution9 Console Window.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dublin University Ladies Boat Club Crest.jpeg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:01, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dublin University Ladies Boat Club Crest.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • This is an orgainsational logo above TOO. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:17, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have an email from the Captain (Ruth M.) authorizing the club logo use. I can forward this to anyone who has concerns. Rgds Colin. 21 August 2014 — Preceding unsigned comment added by ColinDaly75 (talkcontribs) 10:14, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    See WP:CONSENT. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:26, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Burj Khalifa.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: License attribution on the image description page has been updated to reflect author's statement, rather the the missing source image on Commons. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:44, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Burj Khalifa.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • This file was previously listed here (see discussion). However, that discussion was regarding the issue of Freedom of Panorama, and the inherent usability here on en.wiki. That is not the issue I raise here. The concern I have is the image is sourced to a file that no longer exists on Commons. The original source identification is lost. Without it, we have no means of ascertaining if the author of the image has in fact released the issue under the cc-by-sa licenses indicated. There are two copyright issues at stake here; the issue of FOP addressed in the earlier PUF (and cleared) and the issue of the rights of the author of the image. We can not ignore the author's rights. This image is slated to become the picture of the day in November. We need to clear this up, and properly assert the source of the image and the proper copyright status if it can be ascertained. If it can't, then regardless of its status as a featured picture, it would need to be deleted. Hammersoft (talk) 20:58, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: I have notified the person who may be the author of the image to help clarify this issue. See Commons:User_talk:Donaldytong#w:File:Burj_Khalifa.jpg. --Hammersoft (talk) 21:04, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • The uploader, User:King of Hearts, is an administrator on Commons. I would assume that he checked the file information page there before uploading the file. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:28, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Maybe, but it's not stipulated on the file. Given that it's going to be a featured picture, we should clear up inconsistencies on the file description page. --Hammersoft (talk) 22:21, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi Hammersoft, I received your message in my mail box regarding the certification of the original author of the image File:Burj Khalifa.jpg . My Wikipedia user name is Donaldtong, and My Wikimedia Commons user name is Donaldytong (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Donaldytong) , which is my real name Donald Y Tong. I am the original author of this image File:Burj Khalifa.jpg . I cannot remember which license I used when I uploaded this image to Wikimedia Commons in November 2012, but I think I used license {{Self|GFDL|Cc-by-sa-3.0-migrated|cc-by-sa-2.5}}. This license is what I generally use when I contribute my photos to Wikimedia Commons. Here is an example, . The photo of File:Burj Khalifa.jpg would use the same license as this image when they were uploaded to Wikimedia Commons during the same period/time in November 2012. Please let me know whether my above statement met your requirements for the certification of the original author of the image File:Burj Khalifa.jpg. Regards Donaldtong (talk) 10:39, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, I've checked the deleted version at Commons, the uploader did indeed use the licensing tag stated above. The authorship/attribution on the local copy is correct. January (talk) 17:10, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Note that I was the one who deleted the image on Commons; the logical conclusion is that I know the copyright status of the image, no? In the future, please don't nominate images for deletion for such a reason if the uploader is a Commons admin; if you have your doubts, just ask them directly. -- King of ♠ 04:56, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please review near the top of WP:PUF where it says "primary purpose of this page is to ascertain the source and/or copyright status of a file" (emphasis not mine). I did not place this file for deletion. The licensing on the image was unclear. I properly placed it here to clear up the licensing of an image that is slated to be a featured picture. Certainly we want our best work to be inline with our highest expectations for how images are to be handled, no? There is no need for you to be so hostile. --Hammersoft (talk) 17:46, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Riprogers.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:01, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Riprogers.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Stated claim is a photo the uploader personally owns. This is a cell phone photo of another, framed photo. There's no way this is something to which the uploader had copyright. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 22:37, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.