Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 August 16
August 16[edit]
File:Ekthatiger.music.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Relisted at Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 August 24#File:Ekthatiger.music.jpg. — ξxplicit 00:52, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Ekthatiger.music.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No need for second image of the same film in the film article. Binksternet (talk) 04:06, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, quite similar to the poster and fails WP:NFCC#8. Also, this image falls under the same category. Secret of success (talk) 06:32, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Abdulkadir Dheel.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Abdulkadir Dheel.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Source information is disputed. Uploader claims this 1968 photo as his or her own work. That's entirely possible, but I'm skeptical, as the same photo already appears elsewhere before its appearance here: [1] (from 2010) and [2] (also from 2010). Gyrofrog (talk) 16:27, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Microgastrinae.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Microgastrinae.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Currently under a noncommercial license (cc-by-nc-3.0), not a free license. —innotata 17:41, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Nishioka Tsuneo.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Nishioka Tsuneo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Tagged {{PD-self}}, but the file description says it comes from [3]. The notice at the bottom of [4] says, "Copyright notice: We used to have a notice, but we know many of you just use our pics anyway… so now just feel free! […] All further use of the content on this site must be for non-profit purposes." The restriction to non-profit purposes only makes it clear that the images on Jodojo.com have not been released into the public domain. —Bkell (talk) 17:42, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Postdam Schloss pano.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Postdam Schloss pano.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Tagged {{PD-self}}, but Flickr source page says that the image is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic (CC BY-ND 2.0). "NoDerivs" is not free enough for Wikipedia. —Bkell (talk) 17:49, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.