Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 November 17

< November 16	November 18 >

November 17[edit]

File:Mark So 2008.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept. Verification of permission received at OTRS. Shell ^babelfish 21:01, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mark So 2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Sourced to flickr, but the uploader reserves all rights. Lәo_(βǃʘʘɱ) 01:18, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Van Full of Pakistans.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. No evidence of permission, article doesn't contain much more than a song list so fair use likely doesn't apply. Shell ^babelfish 21:09, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Van Full of Pakistans.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Album cover; no source; unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 02:15, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Shay Knuth in 1999.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:05, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shay Knuth in 1999.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Accompanying text and watermark suggest copyright, no OTRS; would not qualify for fair use as replaceable (living person). Skier Dude (talk) 02:17, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:爱情花园.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:05, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:爱情花园.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

album cover; unlikely uploader is (c) holder- from website that appears to be something akin to google image search, not (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:59, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:ELLE封面.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:05, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:ELLE封面.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

appears to be promotional headshot; unlikely uploader is (c) holder- from website that appears to be something akin to google image search, not (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:59, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Liu xijun.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:05, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Liu xijun.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

appears to be promotional headshot; unlikely uploader is (c) holder- from website that appears to be something akin to google image search, not (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:59, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Racerecordscatalog.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Racerecordscatalog.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

False license claim. Publication from 1927 or later. By definition cannot be work by someone dead for more than 100 years as license claims; a few years too recent to be automatically PD-US by age; no evidence of being PD for any other reason offered. Infrogmation (talk) 04:11, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Espn zone.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Espn zone.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Appears to be an extremely reduced version of the image found here: http://www.welcometosocal.com/tickets/DisneylandResortPhotGallery.htm Mosmof (talk) 06:20, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:C S & M.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:05, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:C S & M.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

OR book cover; no source; unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 08:05, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:CAMACOP.svg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept. Now tagged non-free. Shell ^babelfish 22:17, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:CAMACOP.svg (delete | talk | history | logs).

corporate logo; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 08:07, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. File now tagged as non-free. — ξ ^xplicit 07:23, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:CB Stacked green.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:05, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:CB Stacked green.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

OR corporate logo; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 08:08, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:CB42 glow.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:05, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:CB42 glow.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

OR website logo; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 08:08, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:CBIRF.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept. Marine website [1] indicates that this is official logo. Shell ^babelfish 22:27, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:CBIRF.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

corporate/military logo; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 08:10, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Public domain as a United States federal government emblem -- Eastmain (talk) 04:14, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- No source to prove that this is a legit Government emblem rather than a user-created logo. Skier Dude (talk) 04:05, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Sangguniang Kabataan.svg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept. Already tagged non-free. Shell ^babelfish 22:33, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sangguniang Kabataan.svg (delete | talk | history | logs).

school logo; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 08:12, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:43, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Bigcantrel.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bigcantrel.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Listed as PD-self but an identical copy is at http://www.rageagainsttheright.com/guitarists/bigcantrel.jpg and I can see it in at least one other place Peripitus (Talk) 11:58, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Dead46.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dead46.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Copied from http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_2Pui2okD97Y/R-fDF9Mv1TI/AAAAAAAAAoA/TFgSXndpvDQ/s320/dead46.jpg Mushroom (Talk) 12:13, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:1989 EC Champs.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:05, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:1989 EC Champs.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Appears to be a scanned image from a printed source while work is claimed to be the work of the uploader and released into the public domain. MilborneOne (talk) 13:34, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just noticed that this was raised at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 May 12 and then subsequently deleted on 26 May 2009 was re-uploaded by the original uploader a few days later. Can we presume the original deletion decision stands and just delete it ? MilborneOne (talk) 13:47, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is from my yearbook. There is no copyright on this photo as the photographer is long dead.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Lou72JG (talk • contribs) 24 November 2009

- I presume that is an admission that the photographer is dead means the source you added to the image I created this work entirely by myself is false. If you know he his dead then you must know who originally took the image, and even if he died the year the image was taken then that was only twenty years ago so the image is unlikely to be out of copyright. MilborneOne (talk) 12:22, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Zwick All Round.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by MilborneOne (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:43, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zwick All Round.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

no EXIF information, looks like a promotional image. It doesn't look self made. Uploader has uploaded a few more images similar to this one (machines made by this particular company) that are also likely not self made, and could qualify for deletion. Deadstar (talk) 14:02, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted as a copyright violation of http://www.kormtm.com/product/product_list_search.php MilborneOne (talk) 21:37, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Blue area Isl.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by MilborneOne (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:43, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blue area Isl.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

The image clearly states it is the property of infoPakistan.pk. Unless the uploader is also the uploader/owner there, the image is copyrighted Samar (Talk . Contributions) 15:36, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted as a copyright violation from http://www.infopakistan.pk/2009/08/picture-shot-from-blue-area-islamabad/ MilborneOne (talk) 22:12, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:2007 Auction House.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Kept - OTRS permission received - Peripitus (Talk) 02:13, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:2007 Auction House.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

This image is licensed as self-created with copyright owned by "I (Uhm Min Jung) created this work entirely by myself.", but the user uploaded another self-created image with the description "I (Dana Ramosia) created this work entirely by myself." At least one of them is not the uploader, unless there's an explanation for the inconsistency. Mosmof (talk) 15:50, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This doesn't need to be deleted, just change the tag and the info, cause it's already stated by the uploader that they aren't the owner. Colleen16 (talk) 21:07, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It needs to be deleted because if there is no permission from the owner then it's a replaceable fair use image of a living person. The other image should be regarded as suspect too. PC78 (talk) 01:15, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It doesn't need to be deleted, because I have permission from the owner so it isn't replaceable, besides there isn't any other copy like this out anywhere. Just because I'm not the owner doesn't mean that I didn't get permission. It's called "good faith." JKSarang 01:27, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Do you need to fix the license for File:Nam Sang Mi A1.jpg too? --Mosmof (talk) 03:07, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, until permission can be verified at OTRS. J Milburn (talk) 12:16, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- OTRS permission has been verified. J Milburn (talk) 18:15, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:QoS2cast.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept. Non-free, image now reduced in size and smaller area in use. Shell ^babelfish 22:37, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:QoS2cast.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

This image's high (1024px) resolution is not sufficiently justified by the FUR, in my opinion, and is not necessary to readers understanding the topic in question. ╟─Treasury Tag►stannator─╢ 16:20, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Wrong forum. If you want to discuss properties of a non-free image, the appropriate location is WP:NFCR. This page is for discussing whether an image is non-free or not. Jheald (talk) 18:11, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Pardon me; I just ticked the Twinkle option "non-free image" when nominating. Surely things can happen here? ╟─Treasury Tag►secretariat─╢ 18:53, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Shouldn't I have been informed of this deletion. This is the source.http://www.thequeenofswords.net/images.html I used.REVUpminster (talk) 23:29, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have reduced the image resolution. This was the first image I uploaded before I discovered resizing software, but I have recently become the target of a vindictive editor where power seems to have gone to his head.REVUpminster (talk) 23:34, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:43, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.