Wikipedia:Peer review/Newshounds/archive1

Newshounds

I would like this article to be reviewed as I am trying to get it to featured articles status. It is already currently a good article. When I nominated the article for featured status, it was rejected because it was too "list centric,", "cuttered," it didn't, "give any sense of what's notable about it," and that it, "needs more sources other than Newshounds itself and the official site." (See Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Newshounds) I think I've sorted all of this is now, however I am having difficulty finding any reviews. As far as I'm aware, finding reviews for webcomics is difficult.

Main areas that need reviewing are the introduction, the characters, and sources for reviews of webcomics, if there are any.

If you need to find out anything else about Newshounds, there is the website newshounds.com and other Newshounds articles, which can be accessed from the the template at the bottom of the article. ISD 13:28, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

• One thing this article needs is just to be written better. It seems hard to understand for someone (like me) who's never heard of the comic before. Some sentences that need work--
  • British spelling on some words ("satirises", "realised") despite this apparently being an American subject.
  • "possibly based on San Francisco" -- How is this indicated?
  • "they are very political" -- They are political? What does this mean?
  • "There are also some minor characters have returning roles in KPET stories. " Missing a word. Better yet, chop off the first three.
  • No indication of readership level or popularity of the strip. Has it been mentioned in off-line sources? This is probably the biggest issue I have.
  • Is the name "Wolfram Blitzen" meant to reference anyone in particular?
  • Andrew Levine 14:07, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Automated suggestions are provided here, that you may wish to refer for some useful style guidelines. - Mailer Diablo 17:25, 12 August 2006 (UTC)