Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Steely Dan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Keep. Ruslik_Zero 16:53, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Steely Dan

Long since abandoned wikiproject. Only seven members, five of which are inactive since 2007. No relevant discussion about the topic on the talk page at all. This is almost a clone of the former Billy Talent wikiproject, which was just deleted for the same reason. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 02:18, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

• Weak keep - already tagged historical, deletion doesn't save space. –xeno^talk 02:25, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

• What benefit is there to keeping it? The Billy Talent project was tagged as historical under nearly identical circumstances (only it had 7/9 inactive members instead of 5/7) and it got unanimously deleted. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 02:38, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

• Just because something does get deleted, doesn't necessarily mean that it should have. Since Wikipedia saves exactly zero space deleting these old artifacts, there's no net gain, and possible negatives as outlined below by Graeme. –xeno^talk 08:39, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

• Keep - a project that seemed to be fairly active in the past. The history may as well be visible to any one who cares to look. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:59, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.