Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:ThinkNoodles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete . ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:08, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:ThinkNoodles[edit]

May not meet WP:NBIO. —Paleo Neonate – 19:15, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:NMFD, notability requirements such as NBIO do not apply to draft space. I've nominated the draft for speedy deletion as a copyright violation. In general, it looks like this Youtuber has lots of followers so it is plausible that an article on the subject could exist someday, but WP:TNT applies to this version so delete if the speedy is declined. VQuakr (talk) 19:36, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@VQuakr: Thanks for the information. Drafts accumulate fast since the start of WP:ACTRIAL. I wasn't used to them much before, I guess that I should perhaps learn to not care much about garbage accumulation in that namespace (I also made a mistaken/declined A7 CSD tag yesterday). —Paleo Neonate – 19:54, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Apparently a copyright violation, was CSD tagged. —Paleo Neonate – 19:49, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment the material is compatibly licensed under CC-BY-SA 3.0 via Wikia, and all other reproductions of it appear to be copied from Wikia as well. I've made edit summary attribution and declined the CSD. TonyBallioni (talk) 19:57, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch, thanks. My vote is still delete per WP:TNT since it is entirely sourced to Youtube. VQuakr (talk) 00:30, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as overly promotional. WP:NMFD is not policy, and is misleading. Legacypac (talk) 21:07, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep may be largely supportive of its subject, but is not "unambiguous advertising" promotional. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 21:55, 20 October 2017 (UTC).[reply]

I mean, probably only because of the complete inability to write from wherever this was ripped from. Sergecross73 msg me 21:11, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per WP:TNT - if this subject is notable, the article will never look anything like this mess. Sergecross73 msg me 21:11, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.