Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Pawri Ho Rahi Hai

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) Tol (talk | contribs) @ 17:18, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Pawri Ho Rahi Hai[edit]

As per AfC reviewer, the topic is not suitable for Wikipedia. Shinnosuke15, 06:42, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The review only declined. They didn't even reject, so this is terribly premature to bring to MfD. Worse, the draft has good sources. It has too many sources, and they are all recent, so it is not good enough for mainspace. Wait and see if something develops long term. This is what draftspace is for. It's a BLP, but I see no problems.
The draft claims a WP:NEOLOGISM. It takes time to see if it holds. Wait at least six months. This draft belongs and draft and definitely should not be deleted. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:43, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment:
Category:Internet memes indicates 1000 plus articles on various memes seem to be there.
Though I started draft some newcomers submitted it in haste without my inputs and AfC review on a raw draft caused unfortunate hasty opinion. On basis hasty opinion listing it for deletion sounds too premature as earlier user noted.
Including me at least 2 experienced users are committed to the article, whenever we bring it to article namespace if you do not agree with all the way you can feel free to take it to AfD
But looking @ the trajectory mostly both if not both at least either as meme or in biographies if not at least merge–able for Indo–Pakistan relation, Meme and advertising communication information with reliable sources will be there in the draft.
It is already covered in Pakistan and India reliable media but also international media like BBC and Aljazeera have taken note of it.
After Feb 2021 This meme has been covered in middle of the year 2021 end of the year 2021, and latest Top Cricketer Sachin Tendulkar came in the news with meme most recently in last couple of weeks it's another version is in reliable media.
At least one (academic sort) paper is available online already available, (it studies advertising side more) and it's most likely than not likely to remain part of south Asian political commentaries for times to come as among rare examples of people to people level shared culture among Pakistan and India 21st century generation.
If still majority feels to delete then at least remain open minded for restarting it.
I am pinging @Vice regent, USaamo, and Redrose64: these other users who were in the discussion at talk page and or in contributions for their inputs.
Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 10:50, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - It appears that this nomination is based on a reviewer saying that this was not suitable for Wikipedia, but the reviewer who declined it is now a blocked sockpuppet. This is a disruptive nomination. The nominator needs to stop worrying themselves and the community about keeping draftspace clean. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:35, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. We do not delete drafts at Miscellany for Deletion on grounds of notability per WP:NMFD. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:33, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, this meets WP:GNG.VR _talk 14:22, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:NMFD. SK2242 (talk) 19:50, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.