Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 December 8

< December 7	December 9 >

December 8[edit]

File:Abuse filter[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: speedy delete per WP:G3 and WP:G8. The page created was blatant vandalism; also, it was a file description page without a corresponding file. Mz7 (talk) 02:33, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong namespace for creating abuse filters. — B. L. I. R. 02:30, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:End of the Beginning.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense. to PD-ineligible-USonly Whpq (talk) 13:33, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image only contains simple text and is thus ineligible for copyright due to being below the required threshold of originality. Due to being an English work, the license should thus be changed to {{PD-ineligible-USonly|the United Kingdom}}. 2600:1700:9DD0:8FD0:D06A:B61D:2AA2:1697 (talk) 03:51, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:New WHAS logo 2018.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: speedy delete local copy as duplicate of Commons file. Ixfd64 (talk) 06:36, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image only contains simple text/shapes and is thus ineligible for copyright due to being below the required threshold of originality. License should thus be changed to {{PD-textlogo}}. 2600:1700:9DD0:8FD0:D06A:B61D:2AA2:1697 (talk) 04:03, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:10, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Blaze pizza logo.svg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Whpq (talk) 13:37, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There's an alternate logo here that's below the threshold of originality. However, that logo does not appear on the Blaze Pizza home page. Would it make sense to replace the current logo with the other one? Ixfd64 (talk) 04:39, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for the late response, but I'd stick with the current one unless there's a need to use the logo on multiple articles. Troutfarm27 ^(Talk) 23:32, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Global iodized salt logo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Image searching "iodized salt" doesn't show me any packages with this particular logo in use. Potential freely licensed logos could replace this one as it does not appear to be in wide use. Chess (talk) (please use {{reply to|Chess}} on reply) 22:50, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.