Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 October 18

< October 17	October 19 >

October 18[edit]

File:Geogre-1.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn as now used in user space Skier Dude (talk) 03:52, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned user image; no encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 00:43, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - In use now. A record of a wonderful editor who is sorely missed, and from that point of view as encyclopedic as any other file here. We should be collecting these sort of images, not deleting them. --RexxS (talk) 12:35, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Feeling touchy, RexxS? I don't think the nomination was made in bad faith. Orphan user images are often listed here, and calling the nominator out as "insensitive" here is an overreaction, I think. No one's trying to delete the person. – Quadell ^(talk) 13:34, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well, yes, I guess I am a little touchy about Geogre's work. Take a trawl through his user talk page history and you'll see a catalogue of items nominated for deletion – quite unnecessarily – so I'm less than pleased when yet another turns up. I know the nomination wasn't in bad faith and I'm sorry if I gave that impression; I do know it's just Skier Dude's usual gnoming. I'm willing to accept that "insensitive" is too strong - do so many people not know that Geogre hasn't edited for two years and isn't around to speak up in his own defence? --RexxS (talk) 00:42, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - image use policy allows images of users for use in in userspace, image is appropriately licensed. Nikkimaria (talk) 13:21, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, now that it's in use. – Quadell ^(talk) 13:34, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Commons to let more people enjoy Geogre's works! Der yck C. 00:04, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is in use because someone who is not the uploader decided to place them on his userpage specifically to prevent the deletion. In a month or so, when he removes the images, they will, yet again, be orphaned userphotos of inactive user. They have no encyclopedic value, RexxS is just prolonging the process needlessly. Sven Manguard Wha? 08:23, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You really need to get out of the habit of making those sort of bad faith allegations, Sven, it does not suit you. I've made around 50 edits to my userpage in almost four years, and not once have I removed content from it. I thought I had made it clear that I view Geogre as a valued contributor who deserves to be commemorated. Those images will not be orphaned as long as I'm drawing breath, and you have my word on that. So face it: the images are properly licensed and in use. That complies with image policy and my "keep" is founded on policy. Have you worked out yet what your "delete" is based on? Cheers --RexxS (talk) 21:55, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, along with the other four "Geogre" images as unencyclopedic, per Sven Manguard. SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:38, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Frankchu 082205.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OR, possibly F2 - rotation incorrect regardless of preview thumbnail Skier Dude (talk) 01:28, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SReynhoutUserPic.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned personal image; no encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 01:47, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bahay1.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OR, LQ (blur), no encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 01:48, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Corn-Flakes-Box-Small.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image is replaceable on corn flakes with an image of the food itself, rather than the copyrighted packaging. Kelly ^hi! 01:53, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Corn Flakes are an actual brand of breakfast cereal, not just a generic name for it. Articles of brand products commonly use pictures of the packaging if they're labeled as non-free and meet the non-free image constraints, as it's important to capture the essence of the product.Evan-Amos (talk) 02:56, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That would probably be more appropriate for Kellogg Company; that article already has a public domain image to illustrate the brand. Kelly ^hi! 03:01, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A package from 1906 is hardly the same as one from today. Also, the picture is one that I took myself of the product. This isn't an image grab of someone else's work.Evan-Amos (talk) 04:47, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No one disputes you took the photo - however, it is a derivative work and therefore copyrighted. Kelly ^hi! 14:25, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Copyrighted packaging --Sreejith K (talk) 14:27, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - this seems like a valid case for fair use - it is used on a page about a specific product by a specific company, and this is the appearance of the box in which the product is packaged. Just like logos, the very appearance of said box is of encyclopedic interest to the reader, giving the reader an understanding of how the manufacturer wants the item to appear as it is marketed and sold. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:42, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. But I agree that it would be more appropriate to move it to the page about Kellogg. I also would revise the Corn flakes page to move this image out of the top infobox, switching it with one of the flakes-in-bowl images lower down on the page. But there is a lot of text about the history of Kellogg's role in the creation and dissemination of the corn flake, so I believe that the image serves an encyclopedic role in helping the reader understand a major portion of the text. --Tryptofish (talk) 13:54, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KelloggsCornFlakes.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image replaceable by picture of the cereal itself rather than copyrighted packaging. Kelly ^hi! 01:57, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely delete this one. Haven't thought enough about whether one photo of the box would be necessary in the article, but this duplicate nonfree photo is unneeded. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:09, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Chiefmonkey.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OR personal image - no encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 01:58, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Juggaleaux homecoming2001.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OR personal image; no encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 01:59, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Juggaleaux sadie2002.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:09, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned personal image; no encyc purpose Skier Dude (talk) 02:04, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Juggaleaux sadie2001.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:09, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned personal image; no encyc purpose Skier Dude (talk) 02:04, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Juggaleaux prom2001.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:09, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned personal image; no encyc purpose Skier Dude (talk) 02:05, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Juggaleaux angela.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:09, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned personal image; no encyc purpose Skier Dude (talk) 02:05, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Thelochok.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:09, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned personal image; no encyc purpose Skier Dude (talk) 02:07, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead Lochok (talk) 20:19, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NoamKornitz.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:09, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned personal image; no encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 02:38, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Int19h.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:09, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned personal image; no encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 03:08, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Eminem performing in 2011.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:47, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, Used in a now deleted article, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 07:43, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Reasonable quality photo of Eminem. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:14, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. WP:COBWEB. --Tryptofish (talk) 20:46, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Buckcherry Performing Live.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:49, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Used in a now deleted article, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 07:43, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Reasonable quality photo of Buckcherry. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:14, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. WP:COBWEB. --Tryptofish (talk) 20:46, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Smith-Madison 4037483386 602d50357d o.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Obsoleted by File:MadisonRSmith.jpg Magog the Ogre (talk) 08:07, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SP E7 6001.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image removed from EMD E7, Golden Rocket (train), and Golden State (train) on account of being replaceable in the first two (WP:NFCC#1) and decorative on the last (WP:NFCC#8). This has been challenged on grounds that permission for use on Wikipedia (only) has been received. The "permission" received is insufficient, and therefore irrelevant, because it doesn't give us any additional rights on what we can do with it. SchuminWeb (Talk) 11:51, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IMG 2835.JPEG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Where/what is this? Orphan, no description, bad title, never used. Uploader's contribs reveal nothing. If we can't identify it, I don't think it's useful. – Quadell ^(talk) 12:54, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's the main square in Skellefteå, also pictured here. I'll go for weak delete because it's not that good a photo, but maybe others would think it was worth keeping. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:19, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It's not a great photo - not worth moving to Commons. Considering that this appears to be a modern photo, someone can take a better photo from a similar angle. SchuminWeb (Talk) 10:14, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IMG 3084 1.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphan, bad title, random person, never used – Quadell ^(talk) 13:08, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IMG 3071.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unidentified speaker at a minor event, not notable – Quadell ^(talk) 13:10, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Crossover pitcher.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As above, unidentified, not notable – Quadell ^(talk) 13:11, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Crossover uk.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

self-made logo, not used – Quadell ^(talk) 13:11, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Meetmarket4.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphan, unidentified people, not notable – Quadell ^(talk) 13:12, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Meetmarket3.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphan, unidentified people, not notable – Quadell ^(talk) 13:13, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IMG 2982.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, replaced by color-corrected version at File:Khecheopalri boardwalk.jpg – Quadell ^(talk) 13:19, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Second image uploaded by same person, so no need to preserve attribution. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:20, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IMG 3104.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, bad title. Also, copyright status is unclear. (Image of uploader, taken by 3rd party) – Quadell ^(talk) 13:28, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IPhone 4 box.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:10, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

de minimis does not apply as image (Presumably copyright Apple) is central to picture DieSwartzPunkt (talk) 14:12, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong place. The file is in Commons. Please put a nomination there. --Sreejith K (talk) 14:29, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CIMG0959.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, looks like a personal photo, Possible red-eye noted in image, so not best quality. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:46, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hong Kong SAR Passport.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned. This image has gone through so much redaction that it is essentially unusable. Sven Manguard Wha? 15:23, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete low-quality photo anyways--blurry, tilted, cut off. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:21, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Morning sky in a cloudy but beautiful day.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no subject in particular, just a shot of a fraction of a tree and some clouds, so no apparent encyclopedic value. Sven Manguard Wha? 15:24, 18 October 2011 (UTC)* Note: The file was moved from File:CIMG0774lowres.jpg to File:Morning sky in a cloudy but beautiful day.jpg by Vibhijain (talk · contribs) at 13:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC). AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:08, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Till Gerhard's Helter Skelter 2004.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No source, 'own work' licensing template highly dubious, no evidence of permission. Sven Manguard Wha? 15:26, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Plant loaded with Cicadas, Brookfield Zoo,.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, low quality. Sven Manguard Wha? 15:28, 18 October 2011 (UTC)* Note: The file was moved from File:CIMG0841.JPG to File:Plant loaded with Cicadas, Brookfield Zoo,.jpg by Vibhijain (talk · contribs) at 13:30, 19 October 2011 (UTC). AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:08, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Given the somewhat low quality, I'm ambivalent, but I can see a case for moving to Commons because it shows an interesting and encyclopedic phenomenon. --Tryptofish (talk) 18:28, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Carly Mance.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no encyclopedic value, possible attack/malicious intent image based on wording of description Sven Manguard Wha? 15:29, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Inside of a modern manufactured home.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned. Unlike the other two images in this series, this image dosen't really depict anything, and therefore has little encyclopedic value. Sven Manguard Wha? 15:35, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IMG 3429.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:08, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, bad title, never used, it's a bag. – Quadell ^(talk) 15:38, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep reasonable quality photo of a reusable shopping bag. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:22, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Heh, I'd thought it was a purse of some sort. Shows what I know. Yeah, if it's useful, then that's fine. I've moved it to File:Blue reusable shopping bag.JPG and included it in the reusable shopping bag article. – Quadell ^(talk) 12:12, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rushbrooke Arms (Sicklesmere), pub sign.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Coat of arms is the main focus of this picture. No evidence that the coat of arms is itself PD. Orphaned image. Sven Manguard Wha? 15:44, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This is in Bury St Edmunds; isn't this covered by the British FOP laws? Nyttend (talk) 14:01, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:A baby tortieshell named Cosmo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, low quality image of a household pet. Sven Manguard Wha? 15:46, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, useless. Name is deceiving, as well: I expected a turtle, not a cat. Nyttend (talk) 14:00, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Dawww - how can you delete that? Also, Nyttend should read up on Tortoiseshell, which gives no primary definitions with which one should expect a turtle. Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:03, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment- tortieshell is from a british perspective a known cat breed. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:54, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IMG 4050.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan. Functionally equivalent to File:Mount Spokane.jpg on Commons. – Quadell ^(talk) 16:33, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no need for two almost-identical images. Nyttend (talk) 14:01, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IMG 4119.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:33, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image removed from article as unimportant and non-notable. Not used, except in an archive a removed material. – Quadell ^(talk) 16:41, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, no legal problems with the image, and its appearance in an archive page is still useful for helping the reader to understand why it was removed. If archives pages' content is unneeded, why do we keep archives pages in the first place? Nyttend (talk) 14:03, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IMG 4136 1.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphan, bad title, someone's office, not useful – Quadell ^(talk) 16:42, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:V. Shantaram (1901-1990).jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:53, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

this photo is replaceable with reasonable effort. photos and movies published before 1941 in India are public domain in India and the US according to {{PD-India}} (though my math suggests 1936). As of 1941, the subject of this photo had appeared in two movies (same as of 1936) and directed nearly twenty movies (slightly fewer as of 1936). Screenshots from his first two movies would be free (if they survive), and there must be at least some photo of him published before 1936/1941 that we could use instead of this nonfree image. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:00, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

& how do we find out whether the snap is taken before 1936/1941? Guess by his looks?!? -19:45, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Find a photo that is dated, or find an original source (book/newspaper) published before then. Or if you can find one of his first two films, then that's guaranteed public domain. Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:20, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you see, those films you mention dont even have an independent, even stub, article of themselves. & if that doesnt exist, i doubt a picture from that film could be found. Lets keep hunting, till then this picture stays! -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 11:24, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: Non-free image for a deceased person, is being used single time, because suitable free image alternative is not available, hence meets Non-free content criteria. Despite the time period and since the film director, acted in few films, a rare image to find, out here in India. It is a Fair Use image, since the person is deceased. Nevertheless, once a free image is found, this one can certainly be deleted! Care to step in and make a reasonable effort, we'd be grateful. It is so easy to tag a photo for deletion. Pitch in! I am assuming the tagging is in WP:Good faith that is.--Ekabhishek^talk 06:58, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: Same reasons above.--Sreejith K (talk) 11:12, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I just spent some time scouring Google for images, and I can't find any images from either of the pre-1941 films he was in. As director I found one image of him from November 1941, but nothing from before 1941. I'm reasonably certain that there are no such images online. There might be in the print literature somewhere, but nothing available on Google Books shows any usable images either. Much of early Bollywood was simply not adequately preserved, so I can't say whether such an image exists currently or not. – Quadell ^(talk) 12:26, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Given that the subject is deceased, I'm not really sold on the argument that the image is easily replaceable (WP:NFCC#1). It seems to me that the file passes the other NFCC criteria as well. --Tryptofish (talk) 20:52, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, have you read what was written above? Films aren't likely to be in Google Books or the Google image search. We know that free images of him exist, so we know that this is replaceable. You don't say "once a free image is found" if you're not confident that such an image exists. Nyttend (talk) 14:05, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Please note, we do know that images of him once existed which would now be out of copyright. We don't know that they still exist, do we? Film has a surprisingly short lifespan if not adequately preserved. If we have good evidence that these films still exist somewhere, then yes, a non-free image is replaceable. But I can't find any evidence that any copies remain. Can you? – Quadell ^(talk) 17:37, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note - First off, it's 1941 because the law was changed, non-retroactively, in 1991 or 1992 from 50 to 60 years. Second, Commons will accept images that are free in India but not in the US (e.g., 1941 < publication < 1951), despite policy disagreeing (cf. {{Not-PD-US-URAA}}). I've already tried telling them myself; you try telling them not to do that; they're mindnumbingly grumpy about trying to uphold policy.
It is precisely this sort of policy ignoring ambiguity which creates problems with images like this one. Nevertheless, I maintain keep; they can ignore policy all they want; we should uphold it. And as it stands, I don't see proof provided that any < 1942 images can be found via search. Nominator is free to prove me wrong via example. Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:31, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IMG 4453.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphan, bad title, so-so image of pet dog, not encyclopedic – Quadell ^(talk) 19:01, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IMG 4572.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, photo of Alexander Hascher, uploaded by himself (the user's only contribution). Is he notable enough to have an article? – Quadell ^(talk) 19:07, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete based on description on image page, does not seem notable. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:24, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Viewpoint: If it is personal image, as per the nomination state, then Uploading of personal, User images is allowed on Wiki, as perMaking images yourself. No guarantee that user might now become active in future. --Ekabhishek^talk 11:22, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, but the image isn't used, even in user space. We're not an image repository. The uploader literally made one edit--uploading this image--back in December 2007, and hasn't done anything else before or since. – Quadell ^(talk) 12:29, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete without prejudice to recreation - uploader with one contribution, 3.5 years ago (nothing deleted either). If he becomes active again, he's certainly allowed to reupload. Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:22, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IMG 4836.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphan, bad title, not encyclopedic – Quadell ^(talk) 19:26, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IMG 0072.Ludi03.sm.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:13, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

i seriously doubt that this is the uploader's own work. if it's not free, it should be deleted - nonfree photo of living person. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:27, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:-Tahiti 1845-1880-.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GIF file superseded by File:Flag of the Tahiti Protectorate 1843-1880.svg, which was uploaded earlier than this version. Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:47, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wikialbumtemplate.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned; no foreseeable encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 20:00, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PClogo copy.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned, no target article or proposed use Skier Dude (talk) 20:01, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Planmanmotion - ac, ab,st.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

series of a poster, photo & movie still - no sources, probably (c) violation in #1 and #3 (left to Right) Skier Dude (talk) 20:07, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Planman.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no source, uploader is consistent (c) violator - unlikely this will be used Skier Dude (talk) 20:08, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ConformistRebellion.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no foreseeable encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 20:10, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Grefenstette.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned, possible personal image?, no source, no give encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 20:14, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CoolCat-edits.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned user statistics graph, no encyc use if user isn't using it Skier Dude (talk) 20:25, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TTC-colours.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can be represented by table in {{TTC color}}. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 20:33, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The purpose of the graphic, which is sampled from the TTC web site, is to show the progression to that table. Without an example of the source the accuracy of the values used in the color template cannot be evaluated. Now whether this information has any value is another question but does not relate to the use of the file in this context. Secondarywaltz (talk) 10:39, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I don't understand the uploader's meaning. Nyttend (talk) 14:06, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
What he means is that the file exists here to make sure that the template TTC color's parameters are correct. Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:20, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dugg.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned personal image; no foreseeable encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 22:26, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sincity1.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned personal image; no foreseeable encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 22:27, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Udi-rho.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned, too small (resolution) to be of encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 22:35, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Daveulliott1.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Picture fails the non-free content criteria, as it is only used for illustration and doesn't enhance the understanding of the topic and article doesn't contain critical commentary about it. Sir Armbrust ^{Talk to me} _Contribs 22:38, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kingyslife.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

used only on deleted article Ryan King aka. Kingy, no other foreseen use Skier Dude (talk) 22:41, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bumptent.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned personal image; no other enyc use Skier Dude (talk) 22:44, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TheOHM1.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

used on The OHM -- no other foreseeable encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 23:12, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nima river mall.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned personal image, no other encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 23:15, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Huber Marionettes Tillamook Treasure.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned, heavily watermarked, no foreseeable encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 23:29, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Manzanita Fire Resuce.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned, heavily watermarked, no foreseeable encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 23:29, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Manzanita from Neahkahnie Mountain.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned, heavily watermarked, no foreseeable encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 23:30, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Julia Campbell Suzanne Marie Doyon Tillamook Treasure.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned, heavily watermarked, no foreseeable encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 23:31, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Janine James Tillamook Treasure.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned, heavily watermarked, no foreseeable encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 23:31, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Janine James Debussy has left the building.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned, heavily watermarked, no foreseeable encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 23:32, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Without FanCase.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned personal image; no other encyc use foreseen Skier Dude (talk) 23:50, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Daniel bursdag.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no target article given or other encyc use foreseen Skier Dude (talk) 23:52, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gary2.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned, subject not ID'd, no encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 23:54, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Logo-2005.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned logo; no encyc foreseen Skier Dude (talk) 23:55, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.