Wikipedia:Editor review/Nathan2055

Nathan2055[edit]

Nathan2055 (talk · contribs · count) I've been here for a few weeks now. I've tried to contribute as much as I can. I've focused on AFC, vandal-fighting, copyediting, and wikifying articles. Nathan2055 ^talk 22:41, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Questions

What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
I'm very pleased about clearing the AFC backlog completely once.
Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? If you have never been in an editing dispute, explain how you would respond to one.
No, I haven't been in any disputes. If I was, I'd take the matter to a talk page and discuss it until it's solved.
Maybe this will get an answer here because two talk page inquiries have gone without a response. What motivated you to nominate C++ as a good article? When notified that the review had started, did you feel any urge to participate or give a heads up to an editor who might want to participate? When informed that the review had closed without comment did you feel that marking the talk page section as {{Done}} was sufficient? I'll admit writing this in a fit of pique but I'm genuinely curious. Protonk (talk) 23:51, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It looked like it was really close to GA. I really have know knowledge on the subject. I did think about asking for help at Wikipedia talk:Computer science, but I got really busy and forgot to. I thought you meant the talk page message as a notification, so I marked it with {{Done}}, which is my signal for the bot to archive the section now. --Nathan2055 ^talk^-^review 00:05, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. I'm less upset about the GA nom (not your fault that there wasn't enough active interest in the article at the time) than I am about the lack of communication. It sucks to spend a few hours on a review, leave comments on a talk page and have them dismissed with a "done" a week or so later. Protonk (talk) 20:41, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Additional important question. Are you a sockpuppet? jorgenev 23:58, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Additional important reply: Nope, and you can checkuser that if need be! --Nathan2055 ^talk^-^review 17:31, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

You do do a lot at AfC and it hasn't gone unnoticed. You say you completely cleared the backlog once, but I'm sure you've taken a mighty chunk out of it many more times than that ;) Keep up the good work! joe•roe^t•c 20:33, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Due to my increased wikibreak, I'm going to archive this editor review. Once I've done a bit more edits, I will open a new one. Thanks to all who reviewed, Nathan2055 ^talk^-^review 17:34, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]