Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 May 25

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< May 24
May 26 >

May 25[edit]

Category:Antonio Nóbrega albums[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 00:46, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Single redirect for a non-notable album where target offers no additional info about the album itself. Categorization here offers no navigational benefit. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 23:30, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Television stations in the Lincoln–Hastings–Kearney market[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 00:47, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Doesn't make sense to group in a hyphenated market. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 21:25, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Social commentators[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 00:47, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Not a WP:DEFINING characteristic, broadly defined this could describe almost anyone. All of the subcategories by nationality will need to be deleted too. - car chasm (talk) 17:18, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Carchasm: procedural comment, the subcategories should be tagged and listed too. Just deletion of the top category does not make sense, it would merely orphan the subcategories. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:06, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Sure thing! Updated the nom, they should all be tagged and added now - car chasm (talk) 16:05, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment There is a main article called Social commentary, and it has a sort of list of allegedly Social commentary#Famous social commentators, but the entire section is unsourced. For this to be a comprehensible and verifiable concept, the main article needs more WP:RS for better verification. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 21:10, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Listify Nom has a point that which people to include/exclude may not be obvious,or arbitrary. But because it is a legitimate concept, listifying and demanding that every single item on the list is verifiably a "social commentator" seems to be the best solution. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 21:17, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    What would the WP:LSC be? I'm skeptical it's a legitimate concept, in my experience it's used inconsistently whenever a source doesn't have a more specific job title to give someone, so the fact that it's used by a WP:RS to describe someone wouldn't make it verifiable. The list on Social commentary is... dubious to say the least, it's just a bunch of names thrown together. That article should probably be AfD'd also. - car chasm (talk) 16:19, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as WP:SUBJECTIVECAT. No objection to lists but I'm not making it a requirement of my iVote. - RevelationDirect (talk) 19:32, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above and WP:NONDEF. Even if there's a main article, this is too broad and trivial to be defining. Brandmeistertalk 17:51, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Public high schools in suburbs of Chicago[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 00:48, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Category of dubious utility, grouping schools across several different towns and/or counties. We can categorize schools by the places that they're in, but we do not categorize schools by the places that the places they're in happen to be near. Bearcat (talk) 17:02, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:4th-century BC Seleucid monarchs[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:4th-century BC monarchs. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 01:18, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge per WP:SMALLCAT, only one article in the category. The article is already in Category:3rd-century BC Seleucid monarchs so a second merge target is not needed Marcocapelle (talk) 16:43, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:YouTube controversies[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: purge. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 00:50, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This category mostly contains individual YouTube personalities who are deemed controversial for one reason or another. Their categorisation here violates WP:SUBJECTIVECAT. I have two suggestions:
  1. Remove the articles about people, channels or videos, leaving behind only the articles about controversial incidents or aspects of YouTube (e.g., YouTube and privacy, Blocking of YouTube videos in Germany, 2011 Slovenian YouTube incident).
  2. If the resulting category is too small, upmerge everything remaining to the parent categories and delete. gnu57 15:39, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Purge per nom (and possibly upmerge - rather than delete). Marcocapelle (talk) 16:53, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Purge Looks like there will still enough here for a category. - RevelationDirect (talk) 19:36, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Campeonato Nacional de Futebol Feminino (women) seasons[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Campeonato Nacional Feminino seasons. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 00:51, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: "(women)" is redundant with "Feminino", and other subcategories of Category:Campeonato Nacional de Futebol Feminino don't use it. Socccc (talk) 15:32, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Battlestar Galactica (1978) episodes[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 00:52, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: As per the other category, Category:Battlestar Galactica (2004 TV series) episodes. Spinixster (chat!) 03:33, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom: I was just about to make this change when I noticed this CfD.— TAnthonyTalk 00:05, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Railway stations served by TransPennine Express[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 00:52, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: TransPennine Express will be superseded by TransPennine Trains on 28 May. Convention is for similar categories at Category:Railway stations in Great Britain by train operating company to be renamed when a franchise changes hands, e.g when Virgins Trains was replaced by Avanti West Coast [1]. Airpopg (talk) 03:32, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • KEEP FOR NOW as it is not clear what name the new government-owned operator will be using. Based on past franchise take overs, it is feasible that TransPennine Trains Ltd will operate under the brand TransPennine Express. So this nomination is too early. 10mmsocket (talk) 06:56, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support after changeover. As per nom, but should only be renamed after the new franchise takes over. Agree with 10mmsocket that we should wait until we know what trading name (I think that's the right term) that the new operator will use. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 07:03, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Per 10mmsocket, the convention is to use the trading name and we don't know yet what that will be. In the two most recent cases where the operator of last resort as taken over the "Southeastern" and "Northern" brands were retained, so in the absence of an official announcement to the contrary we should expect the same to happen here (see also WP:CRYSTAL). If it does change, then we should change our categories only after it takes effect. Thryduulf (talk) 11:26, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, TransPennine Express brand is transferring to the new operator, so a rename of the category won't be required. Blamelstone (talk) 14:08, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • NOTE: It has been confirmed by TransPennine Trains that they will operate as TransPennine Express, so this proposal can be closed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 10mmsocket (talk • contribs) 07:33, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Novels set in fictional villages[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 June 18#Category:Novels set in fictional villages

Nomination for deletion of Category:Fictional work redirects / Template:R fictional work[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete, per close at TfD; notice no longer needed. (non-admin closure) Skarmory (talk • contribs) 12:58, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 – Pointer to relevant discussion elsewhere.
Nominator's rationale: Nom made to notify CfD users of the deletion discussion going on including this category at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 May 20#R fictional work. You are invited to participate in the discussion. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 02:55, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Do not !vote here; instead, !vote at the TfD page. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 03:00, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2023_May_25&oldid=1160731821"