Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 May 12

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 12[edit]

Category:White horses in England[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:53, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The articles inside aren't about actual horses, but hill figures which fits more into Horses in art. Also, categorizing by color is WP:TRIVIALCAT. Brandmeistertalk 12:07, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 20:13, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 18:26, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Rename per Marcocapelle; I don't see a good reason to merge as this subcategory appears to have a meaningful distinction from its parent. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:51, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rename per Marcocapelle. Based on the main article on [hill figure]]s, there are 17 extant white horse figures in England, while several have been lost. Dimadick (talk) 13:18, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rename per Marcocapelle. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:24, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Northlane[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 May 19#Category:Northlane

Category:British politics[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Politics of the British Isles , and redirect to Category:Politics of the United Kingdom. – Fayenatic London 19:55, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: For me 'British politics' is just an alternative name for 'Politics of the United Kingdom', British politics is redirecting to Politics of the United Kingdom too. Thus I propose to merge content of Category:British politics to Category:Politics of the British Isles and place {{Category redirect}}. Balkovec (talk) 17:50, 11 April 2022 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKEExtraordinary Writ (talk) 23:34, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 20:58, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Academy Award winners and nominees by nationality or region[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 15:51, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: rename and purge, normally nominees are not defining but these lists are an exception. At least make clear that they are lists indeed and purge what is not a list. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:24, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 20:56, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Tourist attractions in Enid, Oklahoma[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:58, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge to the wider category due to the latter currently being empty. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 20:36, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Marcocapelle (talk) 18:59, 10 April 2022 (UTC) [reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 20:56, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • @TenPoundHammer: meanwhile the content has changed to 13 articles and no subcategories. Still there seems no compelling reason to merge. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:11, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:19th-century Russian botanists[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 July 6#Category:19th-century Russian botanists

Category:Iranian Muslims[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: containerize. plicit 13:01, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: containerize per WP:DEFINING, almost all Iranian people are (Shia) Muslim, but it is not a defining characteristic for anyone who is not in the subcategories. Especially Category:Iranian Shia Muslims is full of articles about secular politicians. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:21, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 20:49, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:21st-century Germanic people[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 15:56, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: rename, after the early middle ages historians no longer use the term "Germanic peoples". The only thing these people have in common is a language group. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:35, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose that's exactly what Germanic people means: people speaking Germanic languages Marcelus (talk) 08:52, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 20:48, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose Overly long title, and I doubt that there is another meaning to "Germanic". Dimadick (talk) 13:19, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose -- Category names should be short. If more definition is needed, the place for it is in a headnote. I hope all these are essentially containers; if not they should be. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:29, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Television series by Sande Stewart Television[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 May 19#Category:Television series by Sande Stewart Television

Category:Television series by Mark Goodson-Bill Todman Productions[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 May 19#Category:Television series by Mark Goodson-Bill Todman Productions

Category:Yuri (genre) comics[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Yuri (genre) anime and manga. – Fayenatic London 13:47, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: I don't feel very strongly about renaming, it's more of 'we have several related categories, this can be renamed, merged or deleted and I am not sure what to do, help :D'. If this is about manga, then we already have Category:Yuri (genre) anime and manga, and it could be perhaps renamed to Category:Yuri (genre) manga. Alternatively, since we have Category:Works about lesbians, this could be renamed to an even more clear Category:Comics about lesbians. Or maybe it should just be merged to Category:Lesbian-related comics? It's a bit of a mess. Given the overall perception of Yuri (genre) as Japanese/manga themed lesbian works, I can see Category:Yuri (genre) manga being a subcategory of Category:Lesbian-related comics (which I think would be better of being renamed to "comics about lesbians"...); the problem is the fact that we tend to have a ton of comic-and-animation Japanese groupings through Category:Anime and manga (instead of having properly separated and publicated Category:Anime and Category:Manga trees (which of course exist anyway). Ugh. That seems like a can of worms. Thoughts? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:53, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 18:28, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Merge to parent categories since the category contains only two articles. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:51, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to Category:Yuri (genre) anime and manga. However, I would potentially support splitting that category into an anime and manga category. A discussion should be done prior to the split. Either way, this category should not exist as comics is not the right term for it. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 05:29, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • I did not realize this category exists. Of course that is the most appropriate target. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:29, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment A distinction between anime and manga would be a good idea, but we have the poor habit of using a single article for both an original work and its adaptations to other mediums. We even fail to distinguish that some of them are light novels which received one or more adaptations. Dimadick (talk) 13:24, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Merge per Zxcvbnm. ― Qwerfjkltalk 17:13, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:OCN television dramas[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep - withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 20:00, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: OCN didn't have more unscripted (variety) series. -St3095 (?) 06:55, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 18:28, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: I withdraw this proposal right now. -St3095 (?) 09:31, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Staryi Sambir Raion[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge all. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 20:01, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge, following the merge in real life in the administrative reform of 2020, see also Staryi Sambir Raion. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:13, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 19:41, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 18:27, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

People from places in Iran[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge all Timrollpickering (talk) 08:35, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
more categories
Nominator's rationale: merge per WP:SMALLCAT, these categories currently have only one to three articles. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:15, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 20:53, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 18:26, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Merge all per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:51, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge all per nom. Oculi (talk) 20:54, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Being from a province is not the same as being from a small town and such a mass merge will create more problems in the future than it solves, some actually do not fit the small category criteria either.Abcmaxx (talk) 10:16, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Amarna sites[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 15:57, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge to Category:Amarna Period, tautological categorization, obviously Amarna is the site of Amarna. Marcocapelle (talk) 15:24, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Battles involving the Kingdom of Alashiya[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 15:59, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge per WP:SMALLCAT, currently only one category. Marcocapelle (talk) 14:57, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support We have very few articles on Bronze Age battles, in part because the primary sources are not particularly detailed in this era. Dimadick (talk) 16:35, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:18th-century Roman Catholic bishops in Albania[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. However, as there are categories for the preceding four centuries within Category:Albanian Roman Catholic bishops, I'll replace this with Category:18th-century Albanian Roman Catholic bishops rather than (a) leave a gap or (b) create that one from scratch. – Fayenatic London 09:56, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: No such state as Albania existed in the 18th century. The territory was part of the Ottoman Empire. All members are already diffused to Category:Albanian bishops and to Category:18th-century Roman Catholic bishops in the Ottoman Empire so there is no loss of info. Laurel Lodged (talk) 14:20, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • this argument applies not just to this category but to Category:18th-century Albanian people - and its predecessors. Roman Catholic bishops in Albania are clearly Albanian Roman Catholic priests, and should be attached to those categories. As far as the Roman Catholic church is concerned location is more significant than individual nationality. This category should be (and now is) a subcategory of Category:18th-century Roman Catholic bishops in the Ottoman Empire. There are historical categories for most of the constituent parts of the Ottoman Empire (and the Holy Roman Empire) and they should be retained. Rathfelder (talk) 14:31, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Making it more complicated, Albania was not a constituent part of the Ottoman Empire, it was just a small part of Rumelia Eyalet together with current northern Greece, North Macedonia and Bulgaria. At best there were Albanian-speaking people in the 18th century, but verifiability of language is a likely problem. This situation is very similar to the Holy Roman Empire indeed (of which Germany was not a constituent part). Marcocapelle (talk) 17:57, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      • The Albanians as an ethnic group enter the historical record in the 11th century. What languages they spoke is another matter, because there were Albanian minorities throughout the Balkans and the Italian Peninsula. The Arvanites are basically Hellenized Albanians, and the Arbëreshë people are Italianized Albanians. Dimadick (talk) 13:33, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
        • All very interesting. I think that we are all agreed that there was no such place as "Albania" in the 18th century. The scope and title must change or the category must go. Laurel Lodged (talk) 12:29, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:13, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • This discussion needs to be about the whole of Category:18th-century Albanian people and the earlier centuries. And how can they be Albanian bishops if Albania didnt exist? Rathfelder (talk) 10:58, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional bikers[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 May 20#Category:Fictional bikers

Category:Melodic percussion[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 June 4#Category:Melodic percussion

Category:Fictional body parts[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 June 4#Category:Fictional body parts

Category:Weak interaction[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 June 19#Category:Weak interaction

Category:Strong interaction[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 June 19#Category:Strong interaction

Category:Electromagnetic interaction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete, but I will merge it to parent Category:Fundamental interactions. – Fayenatic London 13:07, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Synonymous subcategory that includes only the main article, Electromagnetism. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 02:19, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep and expand/disseminate one of the four fundamental interactions. There's a slew of physics associated with this. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 18:10, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Assuming this discussion isn't going to be closed soon, delete in the spirit of WP:C2F if it still only contains one article at the time of closure. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:52, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Marcocapelle. ― Qwerfjkltalk 17:22, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Gravitational interaction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete, but I will merge it to parent Category:Fundamental interactions. – Fayenatic London 13:06, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Unnecessary subcategory, synonymous with Category:Gravity, that includes only the main article, Gravity. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 02:16, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep and expand/disseminate one of the four fundamental interactions. There's a slew of physics associated with this. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 18:10, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Assuming this discussion isn't going to be closed soon, delete in the spirit of WP:C2F if it still only contains one article at the time of closure. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:53, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional child prodigies[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep but purge. – Fayenatic London 13:01, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: It's too subjective what counts as a child prodigy, Also, for many of the characters who mostly appear as adults, it's not defining JDDJS (talk to mesee what I've done) 02:02, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: too subjective: What do reliable sources say? Apokrif (talk) 03:21, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.