Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 December 22

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 22[edit]

Category:1867 in sports in New York (state)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 December 30#Category:1867 in sports in New York (state)

Category:1866 in sports in Wisconsin[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 December 30#Category:1866 in sports in Wisconsin

Category:Films about regions[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: partial merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 09:28, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Poorly populated, unnecessary and unhelpful layer. Remove the space category, and move up the documentary category. – Fayenatic London 23:34, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. It is odd to find the outer space subcategory here in the first place. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:17, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Films by city of location[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 09:28, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This was created by user:Stefanomione in 2008, and the target was added by user:Kanghuitari in 2015 and currently holds nothing else. "Films by city of location" must be as opposed to films by city of, erm, er... sorry, this time I can't imagine why he did not just use the shorter name. As usual I suggest moving the older page over the newer – Kanghuitari would have done better to propose renaming rather than to create a one-subcat layer.[1]
Also, delete the two redirects created earlier by Stefanomione who was clearly not having one of his better days. – Fayenatic London 17:53, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Follow-up note: if merged, I will give attention to the two Wikidata items https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q55330 and https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q25218364. – Fayenatic London 17:53, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, there is no added value in adding "of location" in the title, there is even less need to have two category layers. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:22, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge Unnecessary category layer that does nothing but lump three unrelated categories (by setting, by shooting location, or by topic) under a weird title without serving any diffusive function. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 04:03, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Christmas Eve songs[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 09:29, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Do we need to distinguish/breakdown Christmas songs into further sub categories like Christmas eve songs? Its not really a distinguishing feature - the songs in the category are already a mix of the time of year, the day itself and wider cultural/societal associations with the Christmas period. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 17:04, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Dadra and Nagar Haveli district[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge/delete/rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 09:30, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Both categories cover the same topic Robby (talk) 16:07, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Characters of the Wei, Jin, Northern and Southern dynasties[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Wei, Jin, Northern and Southern dynasties people. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 09:33, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: We already have categories for Three Kingdoms people, Jin dynasty people, Northern and Southern dynasties people, and Sixteen Kingdoms people so having this category is completely redundant. Mucube (talk · contribs) 17:02, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is that category not connected to wikidata or something? Because I created the category with wikidata Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 18:21, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 09:40, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Out-of-place artifacts[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 December 30#Category:Out-of-place artifacts