The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: This is more suited as a list of spider-man related titles and characters, with one from DC, rather than anything to do with actual spiders. I’d be surprised if there were enough pages to properly fill the category, and so it should be deleted. Killer Moff (talk) 13:59, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
'Delete' These are mostly humanoids with "spider powers", not spiders. Plantdrew (talk) 16:03, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Rename to Category:International Sports championships in the Americas. I am generally in agreement with Fayenatic london. "Pan American Championships" could easily get confused with the Pan American Games and its affiliates, while "Sports championships in the Americas" is more inclusive for non affiliated sports such as sailing (already in the category). The additional word "International" excludes domestic or generic championships. Otherwise a national championships, the beer pong championships or even a tri-county championship might be able to be included if it were to attain notability in some way. Trackinfo (talk) 06:27, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Instead of female, women is perfect sense. Happypillsjr✉ 05:26, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - I often prefer "women" over "female", but in cases like this, where an appreciable number of articles are likely to be about female performers who are under age 18, I think it's probably better to use the broader term. Anomalous+0 (talk) 07:59, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support rename.@Oculi: I thought there was already a discussion-forged consensus built somewhere that "female" people categories should all be moved to 'women' as more respectful, so those categories may need to be moved too. And@Anomalous+0: I don't think we should be making decisions on Wikipedia on such a basis unless there are legal reasons. Different cultures declare adulthood at different ages. And even still, many groups are still called "women's X" even if the majority of participants are minors, such as high school choirs and junior sports competitions. —Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 16:02, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Not so. There have been many cfds on this matter, which have gone different ways. Eg this one. In any case there is no chance of picking out one from hundreds and renaming it against the unanimous pattern (in say Category:Female singers by nationality). Oculi (talk) 17:53, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Mr. Guye - Thanks for you comment, which actually reinforces my argument as to why it's preferable to use the term "female" in certain cases -- precisely to avoid making those distinctions. Anomalous+0 (talk) 23:46, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Female musicians has 982 subcats, of which 453 contain the word "female". It would take me about 20 minutes to create the nomination listing and tag the categories, if anyone wants to write the rationale. Alternatively, a request at WP:BOTREQ should generate a prompt and helpful response, because this is an easy job for anyone with the tools.--BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (contribs) 03:08, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@DannyS712: See my comment[1] at the BRFA. This is one of the cases where you script wouldn't work (because it wouldn't preserve capitalisation). --BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (contribs) 09:09, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Strongly support - Categories like this for lesser awards just create horrendous clutter and discourage readers from making use of the category system. Anomalous+0 (talk) 08:04, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete after listifying if necessary. This diplomatic awards to foreign heads of state/government are intrinsically NN. A typical OCAWARD case. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:26, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
