Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2017 November 9

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< November 8 November 10 >

November 9[edit]

Category:Tokyo mew mew[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: soft delete (non-admin closure). Marcocapelle (talk) 04:12, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: With only four articles and four images, all of which are already interlinked, this is too few members for categorization (WP:SMALLCAT) —Farix (t | c) 10:46, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Marcocapelle (talk) 19:22, 9 November 2017 (UTC) [reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fushigiboshi no Futagohime[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: soft delete (non-admin closure). Marcocapelle (talk) 04:12, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: With only four articles, all of which are already interlinked, this is too few members for categorization (WP:SMALLCAT) —Farix (t | c) 10:27, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Marcocapelle (talk) 19:22, 9 November 2017 (UTC) [reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Battle Spirits[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: soft delete (non-admin closure). Marcocapelle (talk) 04:12, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: With only four articles, all of which are already interlinked, this is too few members for categorization (WP:SMALLCAT) —Farix (t | c) 10:27, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Marcocapelle (talk) 19:22, 9 November 2017 (UTC) [reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Coroners of Kings County, New York[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:American coroners. I will also add these articles to Category:People from Brooklyn, but feel free to revert that change if you disagree. -- Black Falcon (talk) 04:06, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Too small Rathfelder (talk) 10:17, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Don't merge; these are separate offices for distinct jurisdictions. Despite its title, the Coroner of New York City article appears to cover the same topic as Category:Coroners of New York County, New York, and both of the individuals in the Kings County category held office before Kings County was merged into the City of Greater New York. One could argue for simple deletion, or for upmerger to Category:American coroners, but I don't have an opinion there. Nyttend (talk) 02:17, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • No merge add biographies for additional coroners, they all have obits in the New York Times and held other political positions. --RAN (talk) 05:30, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment -- It is probably the target that is misnamed. They might both be made subcats of Category:Coroners in New York City. However they are both very small categories about a relatively minor local official. Perhaps we might merge them both to my target. I have not formally voted as I do not know enough. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:50, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete When these two men were coroners they were not "of New York City" or "in New York City", they were the coroners of Kings County which at the time was coextensive with the city of Brooklyn, New York, which would not merge into being part of New York City until 1898. However we do not have articles on either man because this father and son team was coroner and assistant coroner together from 1886-1892. No, we have articles on them because they were members of congress. We do not need categories for every point in people's biographies, and they clearly do not in any way qualify for the target category.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:44, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to Category:American coroners although I am somewhat doubtful about that who was the son who was only the assistant coroner. They were neither in nor of New York City.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:45, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Megabovids of Africa[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. -- Black Falcon (talk) 01:10, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Megabovid (and megabovine and big cow) are (currently) redlinks (so it's not clear what the inclusion criteria are). There are no other Megabovid (or Minibovid) categories. Note: This contains only 3 sub-categories so it is an unnecessary layer of categorization. DexDor (talk) 06:20, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Clergy in World War I[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. The Bushranger One ping only 23:49, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: upmerge as an unneeded category layer, it just contains a single subcategory. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:02, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you, Marcocapelle. Merge as nominated. – Fayenatic London 23:52, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Clergy in the American Civil War[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. The Bushranger One ping only 23:50, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: upmerge as an unneeded category layer, with just a single subcategory. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:59, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Peanuts media[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Works based on Peanuts (comic strip). The Bushranger One ping only 23:51, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: C2C; renaming to match similar categories like Works based on Star Wars, Works based on The Simpsons, etc.. Trivialist (talk) 01:21, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2017_November_9&oldid=1074282615"