Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zenith Canada Pathways Fellowship

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Star Mississippi 00:55, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Zenith Canada Pathways Fellowship[edit]

Zenith Canada Pathways Fellowship (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No SIGCOV sources are in the article, and I was unable to find any elsewhere. There are some trivial mentions (e.g.,[1] [2]). That last one, in particular, states that this organization exists and that someone is one of their fellows. HouseBlastertalk 15:07, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A source from SpaceQ, a Canadian media organization for global space news/analysis, was added, as well as a reference to a university article discussing the fellowship and the election of two undergraduates.
Although SIGCOV sources on the Zenith Canada Pathways Fellowship are currently limited, its notability within Canada is roughly proportional to that of American aerospace fellowships such as the Brooke Owens Fellowship, which have had years to accrue press coverage. Articles about major aerospace fellowships have been quite scant until recently; this article exists for completeness. RabidTuberculosis (talk) 05:27, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:TOOSOON and WP:SOAP. This program was just created last year, and while worthy, so are many other scholarship programs. Bearian (talk) 14:45, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:27, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.