Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/YetiForce CRM

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Clear consensus for deletion. North America1000 08:21, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

YetiForce CRM[edit]

YetiForce CRM (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite an extensive search for sources, I was unable to find enough significant reliable coverage for this software. While there are several hits online for the program, most are from unreliable sources such as self-publishing sources, blogs or web forums; the closest I could find to what I could consider as sources are tutorials on how to install it, although their value as a reliable source for establishing notability is questionable. I couldn't actually find any source other than tutorials which specifically discuss the software. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:18, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:19, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:19, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:19, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails criteria for notability WP:GNG
  • Delete as clear advertising and that's all why it exists. SwisterTwister talk 18:50, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show it passes either WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH. Onel5969 TT me 16:54, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Obvious advertising and apparent conflict of interest. Nom was contacted by an individual who appears to be affiliated with the company. Basic google search of their name backs this up.[1]. Wikipedia is not a promotional tool. SephyTheThird (talk) 22:29, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@SephyTheThird: In response, I have left a message on his talk page. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 22:46, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.