Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yamato Hotsuin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Upon reviewing the article, user Tintor2 has significantly improved the article with seven additional sources addressing AfD issues. Valoem talk contrib 19:18, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yamato Hotsuin[edit]

Yamato Hotsuin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This character hasn't achieved the level of notability required to warrant its own article and hence fails at last 4/5 points outlined at WP:GNG. The article should either be userfied until notability can be attained (unlikely) or redirected to the List of Devil Survivor characters where a paragraph of two best describes it. Per some of the reasons I outlined at Talk:Yamato Hotsuin#Notability issues —KirtZMail 18:16, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
In light of below, I still think redirect is the best option as I don't believe the added sourcing is sufficient czar  04:29, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect. An initial search found nothing to add onto this article, and considering the young age of DS2, I doubt that we'll find much in the way of reliable sources that go beyond video game-specific works. - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 07:02, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, I managed to expand the reception section. Don't know if it is enough though.Tintor2 (talk) 12:15, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That reception only focuses on the anime though. It seems to me like we're trying to pass this article on a technicality. The character isnt covered in detail anywhere else and the reception still uses a critics review of the anime and not the character himself. The technicality here is that the critic will obviously have to mention one or two traits of the character for an episode review. If we waive this, Yamato isnt notable. —KirtZMail 18:45, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 05:04, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.