Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WAGMI United
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge and redirect to Crawley Town F.C. as the most sensible option from the replies. The history is preserved so relevant content can be copied over.. David Gerard (talk) 18:47, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
WAGMI United[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- WAGMI United (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NCORP. Single event news. scope_creepTalk 14:24, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cryptocurrency-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 14:54, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 14:55, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 14:55, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 14:55, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 14:57, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 14:58, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:02, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Unsure, I was looking for a redirect, is WAGMI United the company setup just for Crawley Town? Then I would simply just redirect to there. Because all indication from the primary source, [1] It's just appears to be the company name setup to manage the club. That's why I suggest a redirect. Govvy (talk) 15:27, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 19:18, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - Not even sure what this is. May become more notable in time but not the case now. MaskedSinger (talk) 07:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Merge to Crawley Town F.C. This company is just the ownership consortium of Crawley that also sells NFTs that grant the right to weigh in on team management (what could [has] gone wrong?); it's not independently notable as a company. Based on the sources cited here, a new section can be written in the Crawley article about its new ownership and how terrible it is. voorts (talk/contributions) 00:31, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.