Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vector Prime (Transformers)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Autobots. RL0919 (talk) 05:01, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vector Prime (Transformers)[edit]

Vector Prime (Transformers) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable fictional character TTN (talk) 17:03, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 17:03, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 17:03, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 17:03, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I am loath to agree to delete when the first 2 sources are books that I don't have access to. Does anyone have any idea what the treatment of "Vector Prime" in those 2 books is? Rockphed (talk) 17:55, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's extremely unlikely it's anything of importance. It looks more like someone stuck them there to pretend they mean anything seeing as they sourced such a minor piece of information with both. I think it's fairly common throughout these articles because they've been targets for deletion for so long. TTN (talk) 18:09, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: there might be good sources out there. Bigfoot might also exist and ETs might have visited earth in the recent past. I find the three cases to be about equally likely. Rockphed (talk) 18:29, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 03:39, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.