Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Torre Futura

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Black Kite (t) (c) 16:08, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Torre Futura[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Failure to meet WP:N Jminthorne (talk) 03:18, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Sure the article needs expansion and improvement, but that's what expansion and improvement tags are for. This topic in fact has received very significant coverage from reliable sources like La Prensa Gráfica and El Diario de Hoy [1][2][3][4] (these are just a few of the many I found), thus easily satisfying WP:N. And the nom simply stating "Failure to meet WP:N" with absolutely no argument as to why they feel that way gives the impression they want the article deleted for unknown reasons.--Oakshade (talk) 03:37, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Well said and thank you for the feedback. Based on your input and a second look by me I think it is reasonable to close this nom as a speedy keep. Jminthorne (talk) 05:27, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep - Meets or exceeds WP:CORP as reliable sources are available for this article. --Morenooso (talk) 05:54, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Per Morenooso's request, I've imported the history of the Spanish article on this building. Because it didn't go as I expected (I've only one before imported a page), I'll have to delete this article and restore it to get the edit history correct. Please don't see this deletion and restoration as being relevant to this AFD; it's strictly housekeeping. Nyttend (talk) 11:29, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm done deleting and restoring. Nyttend (talk) 11:35, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of El Salvador-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:50, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:50, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - why is this still open? The nominator conceded a Speedy Keep. --Morenooso (talk) 20:09, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.