Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiny Fuppets

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. There do seem to be multiple articles in multiple media covering the series. The "delete" opinions should have addressed them. Sandstein 10:38, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tiny Fuppets[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Original PROD reason was: non-notable website/webseries. After being the subject of a pair of fluff pieces on HuffPo in August 2014, it attracted no further in-depth coverage.

De-PROD'd by Kvng citing WP:NOTTEMPORARY, a misunderstanding of my argument. It was not "temporarily" notable, it was never notable to begin with. Being linked to in two fluff/filler pieces in HuffPo does not constitute notability, particularly since there were no other sources. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 15:19, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 15:19, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 15:19, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 20:29, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I have added another ref. Nothing wrong with existing HuffPo cites. Now mentioned at Scott Gairdner so at least deserves to be redirected there if a consensus indicates a standalone article is undeserved. ~Kvng (talk) 16:49, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No convincing claim to notability. --Andreas Philopater (talk) 18:59, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:50, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.