Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thundercracker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Decepticons. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 03:08, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thundercracker[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article currently fails to establish notability. TTN (talk) 20:44, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 20:44, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or merge to List of Decepticons. BOZ (talk) 03:18, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - this character is easily the closest to notable of TTN's proposals, and I think sources should exist to support an article. I'll look around some. Argento Surfer (talk) 15:12, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't had much luck - it's hard to sift through all the wikis, forums, and retailers. Are their websites that discuss transformers characters, creators, and development the same way some comic websites do? Some place with interviews and reviews of episode content maybe? If, not, then this is a regrettable redirect to List of Decepticons. All the sources show existence only, not notability. Argento Surfer (talk) 17:49, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect or merge as above, unless some good sources can be identified. The article is very long, but much/all of this can be trimmed. Josh Milburn (talk) 01:17, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.