Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thinspiration

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mr.Z-man 07:09, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thinspiration[edit]

Not worth a standalone article, original research and neologism. Redirect to pro-ana perhaps. h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 18:50, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The concept is notable, the term is not. --Blanchardb-Me^MyEars_MyMouth-timed 22:11, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as WP:NEO. JJL (talk) 03:33, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.