Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Duck Knight Returns

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. The one "keep" doesn't actually provide any reason for keeping the article, so I'm going with the creator's request. Sandstein 12:31, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Duck Knight Returns[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

So, this article was actually created by myself some years ago, when I apparently thought this was going to be more notable than it wound up being. The rather lackluster (and in one case, completely non-reliable) sources I wound up sticking in here are not nearly sufficient to support this article, and there really isn't anything else out there. To confuse matters even more, the same title was used for an episode of the current DuckTales (2017 TV series), so pretty much all results when looking for further sources are regarding that instead. If anything, this namespace should probably be re-purposed as a Redirect to the List of DuckTales (2017 TV series) episodes, but the actual content of this article is simply not notable or sourced enough to stick around. Rorshacma (talk) 16:41, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Rorshacma (talk) 16:41, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Is it eligible for WP:G7, it is it pretty different from when you wrote it? -2pou (talk) 17:01, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah, it doesn't have an extensive edit history, but there have been a number of other editors making changes, so I felt it was too different to not have to take it to AFD. Rorshacma (talk) 17:03, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Soft Keep and clean-up refs - If the references aren't reliable or support facts presented in the article, they should be removed. However, I think a better solution might be to keep the article and have a Wikipedia:Disambiguation notice that points to Duck Tales. Alpha⁴⁶¹⁵ _{(talk to me)} 19:54, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 13:27, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 03:40, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.