Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Convent of Hell (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:53, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Convent of Hell[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, no evidence of notability. eh bien mon prince (talk) 23:06, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. GameInfirmary Talk 06:13, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. GameInfirmary Talk 06:13, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. GameInfirmary Talk 06:13, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - being translated by NBM makes me think there's a case for notability, but I'm unable to make one myself. Argento Surfer (talk) 13:52, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not pass WP:NBOOK and also consists of little more than a plot description Atlantic306 (talk) 20:23, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete on account of subject failing WP:NBOOK. We should have a bunch of notability criteria for porn books. -The Gnome (talk) 12:33, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.