Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tasp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge. Exactly where to merge can be hashed out on the talk page. Stifle (talk) 08:15, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tasp[edit]

This element of fiction does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 22:32, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Pleasure center which covers the topic more generally. Colonel Warden (talk) 23:14, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment isn't some notability established by existing in largely the same form in two separate fictional universes by two different sets of authors (Niven et al. vs. Spider Robinson) 70.55.203.112 (talk) 05:15, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:29, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge somewhere in the discussion of Niven's work. Unless I am mistaken, the notability in Niven's series is by far the greater? I do not see that this really needs a separate article, though of course it should have a redirect. It should also be mentioned in "pleasure center" as part of a section on fictional uses of the concept. DGG (talk) 23:29, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, treelo _radda 00:08, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 10:25, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 10:14, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to the article on Niven's Known_Space. Do not merge to pleasure center. You could mention it as "pleasure center in scifi" there, but merging this whole article to a scientific one is inappropriate. VG ☎ 18:28, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just to clarify, I agree with you that it should only be a mention for pleasure center.. The proper merge and redirect is to Niven's work. DGG (talk) 04:15, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.