Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tariq Hilal Al Barwani

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I am discounting the !votes of the two new accounts. Bbb23 (talk) 18:00, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tariq Hilal Al Barwani[edit]

Tariq Hilal Al Barwani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable hacker, IT expert. Has done some good branding, but nothing else. Fails WP:GNG. Amon Stutzman (talk) 09:18, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seems notable from the search on his full name TerryWiki12 (talk) 02:10, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed and reviewed the source. The article however needs to continue being improved. Excundar (talk) 01:37, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There is a Microsoft mention of his credibility https://mvp.microsoft.com/en-us/PublicProfile/37576?fullName=Tariq%20Hilal%20Al-Barwani TerryWiki12 (talk) 02:23, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Am sorry, but that doesn't really cut it for me when it comes to notability. Mathmo Talk 15:15, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 13:21, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - is not notable. (that wiki article would make for a great LinkedIn profile though!) Mathmo Talk 15:15, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Wouldn't updating the content further be a better suggestion than deleting a notable article that would be valuable to a wikipedia? Excundar (talk) 01:36, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I closed this AFD as "Delete" but it was contested so I have decided to relist the discussion for another week.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:38, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep notable but needs further enhancement. Citations and info shared seems legitimate Excundar (talk) 13:31, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.