Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Take me To The Water
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 15:03, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Take me To The Water[edit]
- Take me To The Water (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Procedurally completing nomination on behalf of Logan (talk · contribs) as it appears Twinkle broke. I assume the nomination rationale is on the lines of unreferenced article on a non-notable song. —KuyaBriBriTalk 18:00, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:30, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This is not to be confused with Take me to the river as sung by Big Mouth Billy Bass, as was my first thought. Edison (talk) 23:22, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete absent evidence it is a notable song, such as its having gained a high position in a "chart," or reviews, or significant coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources. Edison (talk) 02:25, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. If anything, this should be properly tagged with the appropriate stub and expand templates. Just because an article is in its infancy does not mean that it should be deleted. The author of the song is notable enough, so there is potential for the article. If no editors find it worth their time to expand, then that is the time to reconsider deletion.Agent 86 (talk) 00:14, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:18, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan Talk Contributions 00:53, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.