Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superstar Limo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. New sources from definitely-reliable publications were added by Toughpigs and no arguments have been raised to dispute the relevance or quality of these over a full relist period. ~ mazca ^talk 00:21, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Superstar Limo[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Could not find any sources. The two sources cited are a YouTube channel and a personal website, neither of which are WP:RS. Redirected to Disney California Adventure, redirect undone for no reason. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:55, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:55, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 03:31, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 03:31, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 03:31, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disney-related deletion discussions. -- φ OnePt618^Talk φ 06:41, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Amusement Parks-related deletion discussions. Toughpigs (talk) 21:58, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of former Disney California Adventure attractions. I'm finding plenty of mentions of the ride, but the vast majority of them are either from unreliable sources (blogs, humor articles, etc), or from purely local coverage. The few bits of information that are showing up in potentially reliable sources are limited to pretty much name dropping it as a former attraction at the park. So, I'm not seeing the coverage needed for this to have an independent article. It is already covered in the list I suggested, though, so at the very least a redirection there should be kept. Rorshacma (talk) 16:42, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as an example of one of Disney's rare flops of an attraction. This in and of itself makes it notable.-- φ OnePt618^Talk φ 07:38, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So that allows it to completely circumvent WP:GNG, WP:RS, and WP:V? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:54, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:08, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the article is light as it stands now, and could really be beefed up with more citations. But those citations are plentiful regarding its notability. For example, Here is a recent Orange County newspaper article that I just ran across that explains how a recent Disney+ show is highlighting it: "The oft-maligned Superstar Limo dark ride is held up as a prime example of offensive theme park design." I'll add this and some other references to the article to beef it up. But I do think it is plenty notable.-- φ OnePt618^Talk φ 06:14, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I searched for the ride after reading this article. So it's a real world case of wanting to know more about it. Jason Quinn (talk) 06:31, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I've added some more sources, including the New York Times and the Boston Globe, talking about the ride as the worst original attraction in Disney California Adventure. I believe that there are now enough sources to establish notability. -- Toughpigs (talk) 04:45, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 21:35, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.