Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suneris, Inc.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Vetigel. Randykitty (talk) 10:54, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Suneris, Inc.[edit]

Suneris, Inc. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

College start-up with limited coverage, no real notability behind it, article reads more like an advertisement. Mrfrobinson (talk) 20:52, 23 March 2014 (UTC) 18:06, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Merge and redirect to Vetigel, their primary product. I'm not seeing evidence of promotional langauge here. I agree that the info on the company is pretty sparse, but the company is also pretty new. There's a few pieces of information about the company in Fortune, but the current sources in the article and additional ones ([1], [2], [3]) are chiefly about the product. I, JethroBT drop me a line 19:03, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge and redirect to Vetigel. Stuartyeates (talk) 02:23, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep While Vetigel is Suneris' main product, the company is notable on its own. Vetigel is only a product for veterinarians and Suneris is working to expand the technology into many markets.[1] There has been a large amount of coverage and interest in Suneris and its philosophy for all of the products that it will bring into the market, such as the piece on Bloomberg Television. [2]. While Suneris was started while its founders were in college, it is now no longer a college start up and is much more than a one product company. -- Freemanscott1123 (talk) 04:30, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.