Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stumble Guys (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify‎. (non-admin closure) Shadow311 (talk) 22:11, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stumble Guys[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the general notability guidelines, with no critic reviews in sight and limited sourcing on the game in general. I managed to find one "review" from Pure Xbox [1], but I don't think that is enough to save this article. λ NegativeMP1 20:44, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. λ NegativeMP1 20:44, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:04, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Review from Multiplayer.it, reliable source per WP:VG/RS, though not enough to pass WP:GNG. --Mika1h (talk) 08:49, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify The article seems pretty rushed, may be a case of WP:TOOSOON. I did notice the Pure Xbox review, and the Multiplayer.it review, but does not seem notable. The article needs to be made better. I suggest the article creator takes the article to draftspace, and works on it a little more, as right now, the article is not ready for mainspace. More reliable sources should help a lot. MKsLifeInANutshell (talk) 15:01, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also sources from Pocket Gamer and Video Games Chronicle I found from the previous deletion discussion. MKsLifeInANutshell (talk) 15:07, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There are two reliable reviews from Multiplayer.it and Pure Xbox, which, along with other significant coverage articles — other than the ones already presented here, such as VGC, I've also found this Eurogamer source — I think it is enough to meet WP:GNG. Skyshiftertalk 15:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify: Looks pretty rushed to me. Recommended this page is put into the draftspace and work on this a bit more. BlakeIsHereStudios (talk | contributions) 18:08, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify, This article is a bit undercooked, so let's put it back in the oven. Samoht27 (talk) 20:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify The Multiplayer.it review to be the only reliable review that provides significant coverage about the game. Many of the other sources listed here are bulletins or updates about commercial performance, such as topping the app charts, which is helpful but not something that would establish notability. The Pure Xbox article is helpful and a reliable source but not strong as a review; the fairly bland positive sentiments paired with the developer's input ("we were advised about during our hands-on session") implies that the writer was not in a position to offer any critical analysis of the game. As stated by others above, this could be made into a notable article but I'm not seeing it from the sources everyone has brought up. Draftifying is an appropriate ATD. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 12:08, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.