Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonata for Viola and Piano, Op.147 (Shostakovich)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 00:22, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sonata for Viola and Piano, Op.147 (Shostakovich)[edit]
- Sonata for Viola and Piano, Op.147 (Shostakovich) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable enough music work to carry it's own article. — ṞṈ™ 06:34, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep An article on the final work by a prominent composer is a reasonable feature of an encyclopaedia. The first Google Books link is to Carlos Prieto's"The Adventures of a Cello" where this is described as "an extraordinary work, both for its depth and beauty... the swan song of a great artist". AllyD (talk) 09:45, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:30, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - as a general rule, penultimate and ultimate works of major composers are probably epitomes of their work, so their last work or two are likely to be notable. In this case, the evidence shows at least reasonable suspicion that this meets WP:MUSIC and WP:GNG. Bearian (talk) 21:36, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.