Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smear Campaign against Iran

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete -- Joolz 01:12, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Smear Campaign against Iran[edit]

the name itself is inherently POV Austrian 12:07, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Completely POV. mrholybrain 12:16, September 11, 2005 (UTC)
"Smear Campaign" is a reality in our world! beleive me ! If not, then why not deleting "Smear Campaign" entry in wikipedia ? The article needs to be rewritten and cleaned up. Sir Jeremy First and so far only contribution of this user. Austrian 13:11, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The Iranian and the US government will certainly agree that "Smear campaigns" exist. But whether there is a "Smear campaign against X" is usually a matter of POV. --Austrian 13:11, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Hopelessly POV based on name. --rob 12:51, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It doesn't contain much except for a list of mostly broken links, and what little there is (including its title) doesn't consider alternative viewpoints, let alone in a balanced way. Jll 13:01, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It's just a short intro with no evidence of a smear campaign, and a load of links. TheMadBaron 13:29, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Hopelessly skewed title. / Peter ^Isotalo 13:56, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Inherently POV. ProhibitOnions 16:53:20, 2005-09-11 (UTC)
Delete. It's so POV it's almost funny. --Apyule 04:54, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete in agreement with TheMadBaron. A bunch of mostly unrelated accusations does not make an objective article demonstrating an organized conspiracy. Maybe an NPOV section could be developed in the Iran article, but this isn't the basis for it. Barno 23:15, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.