Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sivagami (character)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. clpo13_(talk) 18:15, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sivagami (character)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The character has little or no notability outside the film. None of the sources used in the article substantively talk about the character to establish its notability or to warrant a standalone article. This one clearly fails WP:GNG and WP:FICT. —Vensatry _(talk) 06:42, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:07, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Skr15081997 (talk) 14:02, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unnotable film character and article in long term. -Varmapak ^(talk) 06:27, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:52, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and Modify Notable character from a film franchise. Article needs major edits. Title known as Rajamata Sivagami Devi and can be included either as a standalone article or should be one article with all secondary characters outside of Amerandra Baahubali. With comics & short films to be introduced, character development is expected. - Kalyan (talk) 00:18, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah and have you read the policy on WP:CRYSTALBALL? We don't keep article for the assumption that they may become notable in the future. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 14:34, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not notable enough now. Once is, will create article.2.51.22.19 (talk) 13:36, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Completely unnotable film character. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 14:34, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.