Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Secularism in Yemen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Irreligion in Yemen. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:29, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Secularism in Yemen[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page is more or less unsourced. The available citations do not discuss "Secularism in Yemen" either. Dympies (talk) 08:08, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Yemen-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:12, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:12, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Irreligion in Yemen. Left guide (talk) 10:05, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Left guide. There is a notable topic here but this article doesn’t address it properly. The redirect is a decent AtD until someone can make a more coherent and better sourced attempt. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mccapra (talk • contribs) 11:56, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, this was a poor early article attempt. The page should be put up for speedy deletion. Tony24644 (talk) 15:58, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tony24644, was this written with ChatGPT? Curbon7 (talk) 22:29, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Philosophy, Politics, Islam, and Social science. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:46, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Irreligion in Yemen per the comments above. The latter has much better sourcing but needs to be expanded to include more historical perspectives. Eluchil404 (talk) 04:10, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.