Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schutzwald

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 17:21, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Schutzwald[edit]

This element of the Super Robot Wars series doesn't establish independent notability. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, these are just made up of unnecessary plot summary, game guide material, and original research. Relevant AfDs include Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Database (Super Robot Wars), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arado Balanga, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AS Soleares/AS Alegrías, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruach Ganeden and more. All discussions resulted to deletion of the nominated articles. Magioladitis (talk) 11:21, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to a list of characters in that universe as this is a reasonable search term. Merge a reduced amount of verifiable plot info where appropriate. - Mgm|^(talk) 13:41, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 14:07, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. —Magioladitis (talk) 16:37, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as we did with all the other Super Robots articles (more than 60). No notability. -- nips (talk) 17:28, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I gather you think it not suitable even for a redirect? care to explain why? DGG (talk) 17:42, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as inappropriate nomination. This is a potentially mergable or at least redirectable article, and no argument is given why it should not be merged or rdirected. As those are preferred and customary alternatives of fictional game elements, they should be tried in the usual place on an article talk page, not here. Bringing t hem here should be accompanied by an argument for why they should not be even redirected. DGG (talk) 17:53, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Clearly fails WP:N and lacks WP:RS.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:14, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment All content must be sourced; inclusion in a list doesn't remove that requirement. Article can now be found in [1]. -- Magioladitis (talk) 18:16, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails the GNG. RMHED (talk) 23:37, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - no WP:WAF material to merge, but a possible search term. Marasmusine (talk) 20:16, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Actually Merge/Redirect, as in keep essential info. Laurent paris (talk) 16:31, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect: no reliable third party sources exist on this topic and so it inherently fails WP:N. Randomran (talk) 21:26, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete & Redirect: Per all my other "Super Robot War" entries, how many of these noms are there lol! Ryan4314 (talk) 06:09, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.