Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Heal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 06:38, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Heal[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced biography for seven years, I found a few people of the same name (a nice obit of an Illinois farmer, for example), but no in-depth secondary coverage at all. Additional sources welcomed, as always. j⚛e decker ^talk 01:50, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. czar · · 02:34, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. czar · · 02:34, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. czar · · 02:34, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-notable author. Given this is a WP:BLP, we need some sources. Finally, given the content of the article, WP:NOTCV is another relevant point. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 03:29, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A G-search turns up a student from Utah, a fugitive in Thurston Co., VA, and a man from Devonshire - otherwise, nothing about the author - fails WP:GNG and WP:AUTHOR. hmssolent\^{You rang?} _{ship's log} 03:31, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - does not meet WP:GNG. I'm also not finding him listed among lists of prominent dog judges (and there are 1,000s of those); he did judge Great Danes at Crufts in 1998 but that doesn't make him notable! SagaciousPhil - Chat 12:43, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If the importance of the subject is as great as the article seems to claim, then we would be able to find sources. Since they don't really seem to exist, that makes the claims a bit dubious to say the least. Ducknish (talk) 21:37, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per reasons stated above (fails a standard WP:SET) and as WP:SNOWBALL — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tikuko (talk • contribs) 13:58, 2 May 2013‎ (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.