Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roadbuster

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – sgeureka ^t•c 10:54, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Roadbuster[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable fictional topic TTN (talk) 18:55, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 18:55, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 18:55, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 18:55, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable Transformers cruft._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 10:30, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: More than WP:JUSTNOTNOTABLE is needed to judge consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 15:15, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fancruft. Redirect to a related Transformers page, there's not enough non-action figure description to warrant a page specifically for Roadbuster. --Hog Farm (talk) 15:58, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Taking a look at the sources: The first by "Phillip M. Gervais" leads to a fan forum which does not appear to be vetted, the second source seems more reliable although I can find no in depth detail about the author [1], the third source by "Mark Bellomo" is reliable, the 4th source is a patent (unrelated?), sources 5, 7, and 8 link to the same fan forum as source 1, and source 6 leads to a toy website. If anything I would merge the info cited by Mark Bellomo somewhere and toss the rest. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 16:17, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.